|
Air Defenses Stood Down On 911
AFTER ATC Alerts Given
By R. Anderson
the_top_view@hotmail.c
** Dozens of air bases were within MINUTES of BOTH 9.11 targets **
There is now irrefutable evidence which proves massive complicity on the part of the highest levels of government -- along with numerous accomplices and co-conspirators in the military, intelligence and administrative sectors -- in the September 11 atrocities perpetrated against the American people.
Here's the deal.
It is a FACT that DOZENS of Air Force and Air National Guard bases are located within ten to thirty minutes intercept time of BOTH 9.11 target locations. (List of bases provided below.)
It is a FACT that most of these installations have, at the ready, fighter jets such as F-16s to be scrambled on a MOMENT's NOTICE, for intercepting troubled or problem aircraft.
It is a FACT that air defense units DID receive alerts from Air Traffic Controllers and FAA officials on a number of aircraft across the East Coast which had broken communications and deviated radically from established flight paths on the morning of September 11.
It is a FACT that standard intercept procedures for dealing with these kinds of situations ARE TOTALLY ESTABLISHED, IN FORCE and ON-LINE in these United States 365 days a year, 7 days a week, 24 hours a day.
<< Regarding rules governing IFR requirements, see FAA Order 7400.2E 'Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters,' Effective Date: December 7, 2000 (Includes Change 1, effective July 7, 2001), Chapter 14-1-2. Full text posted at: http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/AIR/air1401.html#14-1-2FAA
<
<
<
<
<
<<'Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3610.01A,' 1 June 2001, "Aircraft Piracy (Hijacking) and Destruction of Derelict Airborne Objects," 4. Policy (page 1) PDF available at: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/cjcsd/cjcsi/3610_01a.pdf Backup at: http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/3610_01a.pdf
<
It is a FACT that Air National Guard and Air Force air defense units of the United States WERE PROHIBITED from carrying out their STANDARD INTERCEPT PROCEDURES as detailed above on the morning of 9.11; AFTER they had received the alerts from ATC and FAA.
Absolutely NO executive-level input of ANY KIND is required for standard intercepts to be scrambled.
There was NO indication in any alerts received by air defense units that "SHOOT-DOWNS" may be required as opposed to intercepts -- i.e.; that the planes were definitely under control of "hostile" forces -- because ATC/FAA could NOT have KNOWN that.
When the first alerts were received from Air Traffic Control, ALL that air defense units were required to do was scramble STANDARD interceptors to make contact with the incommunicado and off-course jets. F-16s and other fighter planes WOULD HAVE overtaken EVERY SINGLE HIJACKED PLANE on September 11, BEFORE they had reached their targets! (See below for locations of air bases.)
IF, at the time of interception, it was determined the aircraft were under hostile control and likely to impact targets, high-level air defense commanders at the Pentagon's National Military Command Center (NMCC) are FULLY AUTHORIZED under existing and established regulations and procedures to authorize a shoot-down,. in order to PROTECT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM ATTACK.
Yet air defense units that were READY AND WAITING on 9.11 at DOZENS of nearby installations were ordered NOT to scramble interceptors: they were ordered to stand down from carrying out even the FIRST STAGE of STANDARD INTERCEPT PROCEDURES.
These orders came from the executive office of the president as well as from complicit individuals in the aforementioned NMCC.
There is NO QUESTION that if these interceptors had been scrambled AT THE TIME alerts were received, they would have intercepted the hijacked planes before targets were approached IN EVERY INSTANCE.
And there is NO WAY that the office of the President or the NMCC could have KNOWN through any standard means that these incommunicado flights required anything OTHER than standard interceptions, because ATC and FAA alerts DID NOT relay any such information. The alerts simply requested that STANDARD INTERCEPT PROCEDURES be implemented and that interceptors be scrambled forthwith.
Some disingenuous excuse-makers say things like: "Well, there was no air defense response because the U.S. had NO PROCEDURES for dealing with such 'attacks,' because the U.S. had never BEEN 'attacked' this way before."
This sheer, complete nonsense: fully established procedures for dealing with intercepts of ALL KINDS, including of hostile aircraft, existed on September 11, as detailed above.
Furthermore: when those first alerts were received from ATC/FAA, there was no MENTION of any "attack" and no NEED for "unusual" procedures. There was only a need for STANDARD, FIRST-STAGE INTERCEPTIONS to be scrambled, and higher authorities PREVENTED that.
Other disingenuous excuse-makers THEN say: "Well, of COURSE higher authorities stepped in, because they had to see what was going on with the whole situation, as 'America was under attack.' "
AGAIN: America was NOT "under attack" when those first alerts were received; certainly ATC and FAA had NO WAY of knowing so early in the proceedings that the jets which had broken communications and gone off-course were part of any "attack."
So WHY did the executive branch and high-level military authorities DELIBERATELY order the air defense interceptors to STAND DOWN? NOBODY could have known that early in the proceedings that 'America was under attack"... or COULD they have known?
OBVIOUSLY, those who ordered the stand-down DID know that early in the proceedings that "America was under attack" because they were COMPLICIT in the attack, and took ALL POSSIBLE STEPS to ENSURE that the attack WOULD TAKE PLACE, unimpeded by the air defense of the United States.
True patriots in this land who have SWORN to protect and defend our Republic MUST consider these irrefutable FACTS and set about unswerevingly to bring these complicit individuals to justice. ___
From: AC Subject: USAF ON 11/9/01 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 02:19:23 -0600
As i may have told you long ago, i am a tyro at questioning the state. and such a task is not my principal activity. i am a small, specialty manufacturer who has gotten caught up in being disgusted by my government's lies. and that has caused me to look at certain events more closely than those who are thought to be responsible for that scrutiny.
as you know by now, i have also been outraged by the monstrous lies that the government has foisted on the public, with the cooperation of the press, concerning the failure of the us military to interdict and prevent the murderously damaging conclusion of 3 or 4 commercial airliners on 11/9/01.
just by searching NYT archives, i found the policy and the methodology for intercepting a runaway Lear 35[Payne Stewart's charter]. the story clearly establishes that F16's were scrambled to intercept this bizjet within 25 minutes of its failure to report to controllers upon its reaching its cleared alttitude of 39,000 ft. These F16's were scrambled ONLY upon the loss of a radio communication: the transponder never ceased to function.
the way i view the intercept, the F16 out of Eglin, 500 miles behind the lear 35, travelling at its posted max speed, mach 2+, caught the lear 35 in 30 minutes.
for all of us who care about relating how the attempted coup was facilitated, and care to reveal 11/9/01 as a coup for posterity, then it seems to me essential that this technical record be established...an F16 can catch a 767 within 30 minutes [if it is ordered to do so].
with that understanding, since no one else has done it, i thought it would be of interest to see how many air force [including air national guard, air force reserve] facilities might have been within 500 miles of the "terror" airliners on 11/9/01.
here are the facilities that i found on the USAF website[s].
1. Andrews AFB [11 miles SE of DC].
2. Bolling AFB [3 miles south of US CAPITOL].
3. Dover AFB [3 miles southeast of Dover, Delaware]
4. Hanscom AFB [17 miles northwest of Boston]
5. Langley AFB [3 miles north of Hampton, VA]
6. McGuire AFB [18 miles southeast of Trenton,NJ]
these are the major, active AIR FORCE facilities that could have launched intercepts with the commandeered airliners. all of them, if ordered in a timely fashion, could have intercepted and prevented the collisions with the WTC and the Pentagon.
then there are these minor, active AIR FORCE facilities. i don't know how they function, but for the sake of history, let us note their existence within the umbrella of intercept before any collision with civilans could occur.
7. Cape Cod, MA AFS
8. New Boston, NH AFS
and then there are the AIR NATIONAL GUARD and AIR FORCE RESERVE BASES.
9. Atlantic City Airport, NJ [10 miles west of Atlantic City]
10. Barnes Municipal Airport, MA [3 miles northwest of Westfield]
11. Bradley International Airport, Conn [Windsor Locks]
12. Byrd Field, VA [4 miles southeast of Richmond]
13. Eastern West Virginia Regional Airport [4 miles south of Martinsburg]
14. Frances S. Gabreski Airport, NY [Westhampton Beach]
15. Greater Pittsburgh International Airport, PA [15 miles nw of Pittsburgh]
16. Harrisburg International Airport, PA [10 miles east of Harrisburg]
17. Martin State Airport, MD [8 miles east of Baltimore] 18. New Castle County Airport, DE [5 miles south of Wilmington]
19. Otis ANGB, MA [7 miles northeast of Falmouth]
20. Pease ANGS, NH [Portsmouth]
21. Quonset State Airport, RI [Providence]
22. Rickenbacker ANGB, OH [Columbus, Oh]
23. Stewart International Airport, NY [Newburgh, NY]
24. Westover ARB, MA [5 miles northeast of Chicopee]
25. Willow Grove Naval Air Station, PA [14 miles north of Philadelphia]
26 Yeager Airport, WVA [4 miles northeast of Charleston]
27. Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport ARS, OH [16 miles north of Youngstown]
i am not so naive as to think that all of these installations were prepared to put up intercept, or take-down aircraft that morning. but some number of them may have been able to do that.
and the question has to be, why didn't they? because all that were prepared to intercept and terminate could have done so. what prevented them from even launching intercept aircraft?
that is the question. have we just watched a 7 DAYS IN MAY? wouldn't you like to see the orders that caused all of these aircraft to stand down?
i sure would. because based on the Payne Stewart story, such orders had to have been given. as has been admitted, the automatic response would ordinarily be to intercept and to shoot down.
and based on the Payne Stewart story, we can only conclude that elements within our government, or the shadow government behind it, prevented the intercept and shootdown of the so-called terrorist-commandeered airliners.
|
DEAR AMERICAN PEOPLE....I URGE YOU TO REPAIR THE VERY BAD REPUTATION YOU HAVE ALL AROUND THE WORLD: SHOW THE DOOR NOW, TO YOUR PRESIDENT. HE'S A MURDERER...LIAR AND ALL THAT WILL KILL YOUR COUNTRY, YOUR ECONOMY, YOUR JOBS AND YOU GO DIRECTLY TO A HUGE BLACK HOLE !!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read the link and then decide for your self. If u agrees with the research
all I ask u to do is show it to your friend and family. E Mail to at least
10 people. We will soon reach all the People in the world.
Only way we can make America and its allies pay for the suffering they
inflected on the humanity is to stop buying all goods made by the American
companies. With out the profit they will suffer and the nation. If your not
sure, don’t buy the goods. Sell your share holding and invest in gold or
keep it your country currency. Try and not to keep your money in Dollars.
This is the only way we can win the war and if we unite we will win and make
them suffer for all the lies. Don’t forget America gives money to Israel
every year to kill Muslims. They will only go to see Arab leaders when they
want some thing and will lie to make them feel that they are on their side
and Have no shame. Americans system and big businesses are control by the
Jews.
I am a shame to say Arab governments and all the rich Muslim are supporting
the Americans and their cronies.
I beg u not to buy any American goods at all and tell all your friends and
family to do the same. Buy Gold, Sell Shares and the Inflated Dollars.
Make copy of the article, save it on the hard drive and distributes many
copy as possible. Site may be take off, Then no one will be able to see it.
The World Trade Center Demolition
and the So-Called War on Terrorism
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html
EXPOSING THE WTC BOMB PLOT...
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/psyopnews1.htm
Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics!
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/mslp_ii.htm
The South Tower Impact
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/impact2.htm
Message Concerning Collapse of
the World Trade Center Towers
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/davidr.html
I Tried To Be Patriotic
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wot/mcmichael.htm
Hunt the Boeing! And test your perceptions!
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
The Waco Massacre
http://serendipity.magnet.ch/waco.html
The WTC Demolition and the War on Terrorism
http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=18897
Passport discovery
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1546000/1546927.stm
Anthrax attacks
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/audiovideo/programmes/newsnight/archive/newsid_1873000/1873368.stm
I looked at the passenger lists of those four flights. To my surprise, the
lists contained none of the hijackers' names. Here are the URLs I checked
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html
Why hasn't the media stressed the 4,000 Jews who did not turn up for work on
Sept. 11
http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/1106/p1s1-wogi.html
The National Debt is more than Trillion!
http://www.federalbudget.com/
THE MAGIC ECONOMY
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/body_index3.cfm?id=3071&tp=a
Losses of over Billion
http://www.smartstockinvestor.com/commentary.html
Looming deficit crisis in U.S. bad news for world's economy
http://www.canada.com/halifax/dailynews/columnists/story.asp?id={29B55F66-3829-4285-B6BA-AC2AD7E3DABA}
GoldTrends 2
http://www.zealllc.com/2002/goldtr2.htm
http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_02/ing050902.html
Walloped dollar to accelerate gold
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/yhoo/story.asp?source=blq/yhoo&siteid=yhoo&dist=yhoo&guid=%7B6DF826ED%2D429D%2D4732%2DAA49%2D128747DD5497%7D
____________________________________
|
Bombs Inside WTC
INFORMATION WORLD-ACTION INSPIRATION
BOMBS INSIDE WORLD TRADE
CENTER AND THE PENTAGON
-----------------------------------------
PLEASE SEND THIS INFORMATION EVERYWHERE -
AND ASK PEOPLE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT - NOW
- OR, AS CITIZENS OF THE USA OR UK, WE WILL BE
PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT HAPPENS NEXT.
(I have tidied up Henrik's use of English a little, but
his English is much, much better than my Danish.)
Michael, World-Action
-----------------------------------------
On April 2nd., 2002 the Danish author and
scientist Henrik Melvang released his NEW
video documentary in Denmark.
The video is 4 hours long and it's original title in Danish is:
"Bomberne som Forsvandt". (NWO doc. 1:4) (Part 1)
Translated title: "The Bombs Which Disappeared" Part 1.
Or: "The Vanishing WTC Bombs of Sept. 11" Part 1
The video was recorded in Denmark
by "Unmask Production", Henrik Melvang
Box 86, DK-6600 Vejen, Denmark, EU
Fax: +45-74834085, Email: melvang@unmask.dk
http://www.unmask.dk
http://www.bombsinsidewtc.dk
The controversial "video title" above, refers to the numerous bombs
which were detonated on Sept. 11, 2001 and which caused the collapse
of both WTC Twin-towers and the Pentagon west section. But the title
also indicates that these named "bombs inside" were almost forgotten
by the Worlds News medias, only 5-10 hours after the "terror event"
took place.
On Sept. 12, nobody in the medias reported about these bombs anymore,
or seemed to care about the existence of these huge bombs since almost
everyone had already bought into the phony and pre-arranged, pre-staged
and pre-scripted:
"Bin Laden, Al-Queda, Airplane-Coverup, STORY"
(with photos of 19 Arabs, and the phony Atta-Jihad-Suicideletter, etc.)
Some people may have some difficulties in understanding WHY these
"bombs inside" are so important - in order to understand the secret agenda
behind the terror events of Sept. 11 (and our modern world in general).
That is why, I recommend my coming 16 hours of videos concerning this
very issue. ('Part 1' will be a good start).
If you want to order the 4 hours video now, then please
send me an email (or use order fax: +45-74834085).
If you want to READ MORE about it all (before
ordering the video) - More ENGLISH TEXT BELOW:
EVIDENCE OF BOMBS INSIDE THE WTC
AND PENTAGON: THERE WERE SEVERAL
BOMBS INSIDE BOTH THE WORLD TRADE
CENTER AND THE PENTAGON!
The collapse of the WTC and Pentagon was not caused
by the plane crash and the fire inside. Why do they deny
the fact? The FBI and CIA officially deny there were
several bombs detonated inside the buildings.
THE REASON FOR THIS DENIAL IS VERY SIMPLE:
1) If they admit the existence of all these huge
bombs, they can no longer maintain the "Jihad
Matrix" as the convenient scapegoat theory.
The "idea of an enemy" can no longer be solely personificated in
the names of "Mohammed Atta" and "Bin (Frankenstein) Laden"
as the "Enemy from outside" ("Al-Queda").
People would soon realize that the real enemy, is
not from "outside" - but instead an: "Enemy Within".
If they admit that there were bombs placed inside WTC, and that it
was these huge bombs which caused the collapse of the twin-towers
- they also admit that THEY ....... (FBI and CIA) ....... were INVOLVED.
Because no one would believe that Bin Laden and the Al-Queda
would be able to place so many bombs inside the heavy guarded
WTC complex.
Also people would soon realize that the Al-Queda network would not
have spent so many resources in the hijacking of 4 or more airplanes,
if they had already placed several bombs inside the WTC and Pentagon.
The tremendous logistics involved in the hijacking of the airplanes, and
the high risk of a total failure of such an airplane terror attack, would
make no sense at all, if Bin Laden's Al-Queda Network had already
placed several high level explosives inside the entire WTC complex.
So seen from this point of view alone - any theories of an Al-Queda
involvement concerning the "bombs inside" must be completely
abandoned. The Al-Queda network and similar organisations would
always be able to hijack an airplane now and then, and this could
probably be done everywhere in the world in the future also. But they
would never be able to co-ordinate the hijacking of 4 or more planes
for over an hour, and by no means could they have placed so many
bombs inside the WTC unless the FBI/CIA were fully involved in the plot.
Consequently the "5th. Column of the FBI/CIA" (or other secret
task forces) must have been involved in the detonation of all these
bombs. These secret groups which are used and paid for by the
"elite" are responsible of more than 80% of the total death toll,
which again mean, that they are FULLY responsible of everything
which happened on Sept. 11, 2001 (and what took place in the
days before the attack).
2) All the numerous intelligence organization
around the world have been infiltrated by the
"illuminati" and the "freemasons" for the past
300 years or more.
This conspiracy is not an american conspiracy - it is an international
conspiracy with an international political and esoteric goal.
The secret international masonic agenda: NWO!
(Latin: "Novus Ordo Seclorum" = "New World Order" (NWO))
There is no intelligence organization in the world which has not
been subject to the "masonic double state inside the State matrix".
"The masonic mandate is: INFILTRATION!"
(Harvard Prof. Gail Riplinger in her book "New Age Bible Verses").
And you name it - there is in world history
NO exception from this very principle!
Take a look at the most famous Intelligence Organizations in the world:
FBI/CIA/IRS/NSA/Secret Service/FEMA/MI5/MI6/Scotland Yard/Mossad and
the KGB etc... - They were all infiltrated by a "5th. column" from the very
first day they were founded.
Since FBI/CIA have the general supervision and jurisdiction concerning
"Terrorism", they are obviously to be blamed if they fail to detect this
"enemy within" (year after year).
Also they are guilty of a "Joint-Terror-Conspiracy" if they had fore-
knowledge of the terror event. Omission is just as bad as commision.
On Sept. 11, 2001 - it became evident that FBI/CIA did nothing to prevent the
Al-Queda and Osama Bin Laden's network from doing what they had in mind.
Four or more planes were allowed to fly freely around in the airspace of
Washington and New York - for HOURS without any kind of Counterattack.
This is clear evidence of a joint conspiracy.
Basically the Al-Queda Network is controlled by foreign intelligence.
Bin Laden is a mediocre mind, who may see himself as an Islamic
freedom fighter, but who was in reality unable to discover the huge
number of "Agent provocateurs" and "Double agents" which infiltrated
his famous "Al-Queda organization" - more than 10 years ago.
The "Taliban rule" was also a creation of the foreign intelligence
network, which was set up in order to establish a "scapegoat
campus" for the future terrorist attacks.
THE CORRUPTION OF EVIDENCE:
Most of the Ordinary FBI/CIA employees are not a part of this conspiracy.
But they will become guilty of high crimes if they participate in the
corruption of evidence.
Since Sept. 11 there has been no real investigation of the "crime scenes"
at all. All the steel from WTC and the Pentagon contained an enormous
amount of evidence.
This "mountain of evidence" should be investigated, but only very little has
been analysed. If real bomb experts had a change to analyse the steel and
concrete, they would discover several "Bomb marks" from high explosives.
As a matter of fact some experts have already reported about this. That is
why the FBI decided to make a "total demolition" of all the "Crime scenes"
so fast after the attack.
Most of the Steel from the WTC complex was never analysed before
it was driven away and recycled (melted).
(PS: In Washington there has already been held a "crisis meeting"
(hearing) in March 2002 in order to file an official complaint about
this "corruption of evidence". The FBI are not allowed to melt any
part of the steel from WTC, since it is a part of the important
LEGAL evidence).
Also the Pentagon crime scene was corrupted. Only few months after
the attack the entire west section of Pentagon was rebuilt, and in the
meantime the rubble was corrupted - so that no-one had a chance to
examine the evidence of the Bomb explosions inside the Pentagon.
(The "fast demolition pattern" of the FBI continues in the footsteps
of WACO 1993 and OKLAHOMA 1995)
Several Bombs INSIDE the Pentagon.
The phony FBI theory of "Flight 77" is a FICTION!
The official FBI explanation concerning the Pentagon
attack contains a "phony story" about a Boeing 757
crashing down into the Pentagon Buildings westside.
The wingspan of a Boeing 757 is circa 40 meters. And such a huge plane
could not have flown in from the west and penetrated the west facade -
WITHOUT first having broken several of the numerous amount of Light
Poles and Traffic Signs which were surrounding the Pentagons west side.
But these light poles were left unharmed. (Check out the pictures for yourself).
This means in plain english : That there was no Boeing
757 which crashed down into the Pentagon on Sept. 11.
Had this been the case, there would also have been a much bigger hole in
the west facade of Pentagon. And what happened to the wings of the Boeing?
Did they enter the small hole or did they disappear outside the facade ?
No debris from a plane crash was visible outside the
Pentagon - obviously there was NO plane crash !
And what about the TWO huge Engines of the Boeing 757?
Did the engines penetrate the facade of Pentagon, and if so - what
happened to the penetration holes of these TWO Boeing Engines?
...........NO Holes are visible on any of the live pictures.
And what actually happened to the TWO Boeing Engines?............
The Fire-fighters who entered the burning Pentagon building saw
NO debris..... and found NO Engines inside the Pentagon building.
(Yet the FBI still claim they found the TWO Black Boxes!? Evidently the FBI
is prepared to do everything to corrupt any of the involved crime scenes).
Also the remaining walls in the attacked part of the burning Pentagon
were destroyed only few hours after the attack. This destruction was
made by a huge demolition Crane.
The official explanation of this intervention with a demolition Crane, was
that they feared that the building was unstable and that the roof may soon
have collapsed. The truth however is that this was a "coverup-story".
The real reason for using this Crane was that they could not promote the
myth of a BOEING Plane Crash at Pentagon, if there was NO BIG HOLE in
the Facade of the Pentagon Building. That is why they used the demolition
Crane in order to make the hole in the Facade look bigger.
The original holes in Pentagon was caused by the exploding bombs
(and/or a Helicopter). But the size of these penetration holes were not big
enough to convince the public that Pentagon was struck by a Boeing 757.
That is why they used the Crane to enlarge the penetration hole in the
Pentagon's west-Facade.
After an hour a 10 meter big opening Gap, could be exposed in front
of the Worlds News medias.
Before this took place the Press was asked not to take pictures from
certain angles. If you recall the first hours on Sept. 11 - you will remember
that we saw only long distance photos/film of a distant burning Pentagon
Building. (NO close-ups were allowed)
Many from the Press complained about this, and asked themselves:
What is it that they are trying to hide from us?
The 10 meter big hole in the Pentagon facade was made to help
promote the phony "Boeing Plane Crash Myth" of "Flight 77", which
the FBI claimed had crashed down into the Pentagon on Sept 11.
The FBI and the "Illuminati Shadow Government" wish to link the Pentagon
Attack to "Flight 77" and then afterwards sell us the "decoy-theory" of the
"19 Arab Hijackers". But the Official FBI history of the identity of the 19 Arabs,
as promoted by the the FBI on Sept, 14, 2001 - has been proven wrong
several times since then. (That is why FBI decided to remove the Faces
and Names of all these 19 Arab Hijackers from their FBI website. Note:
The "FBI 19 Arabs link" is no longer available. Try it out for yourself).
Go to: http://www.fbi.gov
(and "Search" for the Sept. 14, 2001 Press
Release about "Hijackers/Images")
The first Official reports of the Pentagon Attack was
that something "Unidentified" had struck Pentagon
at circa 9:30 (Washington Local time).
As a matter of fact this Official theory of an "Unidentified Plane"
crashing at circa 9:30 was presented by most of the big Newspapers
here in Denmark (Europe) on September 12, 2001.
Some other papers said circa 9:45 , but in general most Newspapers
said 9.30. Later on Sept 13 - the FBI changed all this. Also the route
of "Flight 77" was changed.
On Sept. 12 all the Danish Newspapers reported that "Flight 77" flew
from Washington "Dulles" to New York and crashed into TOWER 2
(the 2WTC "Southtower") at circa 9:03 (New York local time)
But the next day all this had suddenly changed. WHY???
On Sept. 13-14 the FBI explained that "Flight 77" did not
fly to New York, but had hit the Pentagon instead. Then
they also changed the time from 9:30 to 9:43 (or 9:45).
Obviously the factual and correct "Pentagon time" 9:30 - is very important !
Several Eyewitnesses confirmed that they saw "Smoke from Pentagon"
at circa 9:30.
And if there is smoke...... there is also........ (Fire)!?
The FBI's claim about 9:45 was made
to link the Pentagon Attack to Flight 77.
But as I said before people had already seen FIRE and Smoke at 9:30.
On Sept. 11, the (now present) Danish Foreign Minister Mr. Per Stig Møller
was in Washington, and was therefore interviewed by "Denmarks Radio"
DR "P3" early in the morning at circa 7:30 on Sept. 12. And he explained
that he had seen a big cloud of "FIRE" and "SMOKE" from the Pentagon
at circa. 9:32 (local time)
Mr. Per Stig Møller also explained in the Danish Radio, that he had said
to his friends after he saw the smoke, I quote: "I think that there has been
a Bomb detonated at the Pentagon!" (Nobody believed that in the minute
he said it, but later they also saw the clouds of smoke rising up from the
Pentagon)
This testimony of Mr. Per Stig Møller - along with thousands of others
eyewitnesses who did experience, or must have experienced the same
scenario - puts the "FBI cover up story" - in a very bad light.
TERROR BOMBS inside The World Trade Center
(WTC, Lower Manhattan, New York, USA)
Special BOMB Testimony presented in my video:
Watch the eyewitness testimony of more than 10 eyewitnesses
who report that they experienced SEVERAL bombs INSIDE the WTC.
Listen to the businessman, who came out on the street and explained
that a huge bomb was detonated at Floor level 8 - inside the WTC tower.
Also watch the policeman as he explains that they were buried twice by
concrete inside the towers before any of the Twin-Towers had collapsed.
(This is clear evidence of huge Bombs detonated inside
and before collapse)
Several bombs were detonated inside and
under the WTC-complex before all of the
SEVEN WTC-building later collapsed.
Both the WTC Twintowers were exposed to heavy bombs being
detonated inside and below - before the Towers fell down.
Several Bomb explosions were taking place INSIDE the WTC and Bombs
were detonated far below the Towers Crash level and these Demolition
Bombs can be seen on certain and selected live TV pictures of the
WTC Tower collapses.
But in general the News medias that controlled the flow of video transmissions
on Sept. 11 (and in the days that followed) - have tried to CENSOR most
of the video clips of the WTC Tower collapse. (Manipulated video editing
gives evidence of all this). On my video I will present evidence of both "TV
Picture Censorship" and "Sound Track Censorship".
The "Live TV Picture Censorship" was
conducted in the following manner:
1) The original Video clips of both Tower Collapses
were NOT always shown in its entire length.
A) The Video Clips were mostly edited so that they showed an already
BEGUN video fraction of the Tower collapse. The Video Clips should
also have included the seconds just BEFORE the Towers began to fall
(but these important seconds just prior to the fall of the Top of the WTC
- were rarely shown. Less than 1% of the average tower scenes would
include this). This censorship was made to prevent a "sound exposure"
from the original bombs being detonated in the seconds prior to the
start of the collapse of the WTC Roof-top. (Read more about the
"SOUND censorship" below)
B) Video Clips of the falling Towers were often edited in a manner that
prevented the TV viewers in getting the "Full picture" of the entire tower
collapse. We must assume that more than 1000 different video cameras
were aimed at the WTC twintowers at ANY time. Some of these video
cameras may have "Zoomed in" on certain areas of the falling Towers
- while other cameras did not zoom in, but kept on recording in a
"wide-angle" and "long distance horizontal position". Since we know
that many of the big TV stations had several long distance cameras
aimed at the WTC Twintowers at any time, it is very difficult to understand
why we have seen only very few video-clips from these long distance
camera shots. On the other hand the answer is very simple. These long
distance shots give a "FULL Picture" of what happened to the entire
FACADE of the falling towers.
During my 1000 hours of video investigation I have found only very few
of such "Full picture long distance shots", which showed the entire tower
(from top to bottom). Most of the video-clips we saw on Sept. 11 (and in
the weeks that followed) would be edited versions, which presented a
"video-mix" of several types of camera angels/zooms/and close up/mixed
long distance etc.
Such bad editing however does not give a "Full picture" of the pattern
of the falling Twintowers. I have seen several News-blocks which repeated
the same "Video-mix" again and again - without ever giving the "Full
Picture" of what happened to the Towers.
Typically this is what happened in the general video editing:
(An Example of the average "Video TOWER Mix"):
FIRST they will show a "Zoomed in close up photo" of the collapsing
TOP of the falling tower . (No Exploding Bombs are visible on such video
clips since the entire WTC facade is not shown) In the NEXT video clip
they will show a short duration long distance video clip of the entire
Tower facade.
(No Exploding Bombs are visible on such short video clips -
since the short duration of this video clip did not show any bombs)
In the FOLLOWING clip they will again "Zoom in" and show a "Close-Up"
of the "falling debris". We will see a close up of steel and concrete and
dust falling down. (No Exploding Bombs are visible on such close-ups
of falling debris and dust since NO pictures are shown of the part of the
Tower FACADE below. The part of the WTC facade which have not yet
collapsed are not shown in this video clip).
FINALLY they will "Zoom Out" and give you a long distance view of the
collapsing tower, but this "Zoom Out" will happen at a time where the
bombs have long exploded, and the entire scene is just covered up in
dust clouds and falling debris. (No Exploding Bombs are visible on
this last video clip - since it is all over!)
COMMENT:
You may say that you have seen some TV Transmissions, which did not
edit the "Tower Scene" in this manner. This is true, and in my video I will
show some of these few TV Transmissions, which actually did give us a
chance to follow the entire WTC facade, as it collapsed from the TOP to the
Bottom. But in general most TV stations did not show the ENTIRE WTC
Tower facade during the ENTIRE duration of the Tower Collapse.
As I said before I have seen many different TV stations video versions
of the "Tower collapse", but in general 99% of the TOTAL AIRING of the
Tower scenes did not give any evidence of the numerous of "clouds"
from EXPLODING Bombs "popping out of the windows" of the WTC
facade far below the crash level of the collapsing tower.
This high number of 99% (of the total airplay) does make an important
difference for the average viewer who had no knowledge of a conspiracy.
The effect of TV is basically "exposure". But in reality the Tower Scene
should have been edited in a much different manner - if we look at the
"Photographic nature of the Tower scene".
Usually when the TV News medias shows a controlled demolition of a
building anywhere in the world, they NEVER forget to give the TV audience
the "Full Picture" of the scene. They always give us a "Long Distance shot
of the entire Tower scene". They may show us some "Zoomed in details"
also, but they will never miss the opportunity to show you the "full picture"
of the entire fall of the tower (or building).
Every year the TV News medias show us such demolition scenes of various
buildings. I have never seen a TV Transmission which did not give the
"Full Picture" - have you?
The "Photographic nature of the Scene" would call for a "Wide angle
view" - so that the TV audience can see the tower falling in it's full length.
But the Tower event of "September 11" turned out to be different!
And this was not because the long distance cameras were not in
place to shoot the "Horizontal Long-distance Tower Scenes".
Never in recorded World history had so many long distance cameras
focused on the very same subject as between 9:00 AM and 10:30?
on Sept. 11, 2001.
Why then is the obvious long-distance shoot of the WTC
collapse so badly represented in the TV Transmissions?
It totally contradicts the nature of the Tower Scene
- does it not!? The answer to this question is obvious:
Someone in the "editing rooms" did not
want to give us the "Full Picture"!
C) Commercial video censorship of
various "amateurs recordings"???
We know that several video amateurs must have taken several good
pictures from various angles and various Tower scenes. But did we
ever get to see their video coverage?
....... in its ENTIRE LENGTH.......... and with ORIGINAL SOUND!?
On Sept. 11 (and in the days that followed) many video amateurs SOLD
their video clips to the big News agencies and huge TV stations. This again
mean that the "entire video editing process" were now in the hands of the
"Big Government". If someone wished to conspire on Sept. 11 - they had
a perfect chance to do it in the "editing process" of the crucial video
EVIDENCE which was now left at their disposal. The BIG News medias
fully controlled the TV flow in the days after Sept. 11.
But some crucial BOMB video evidence did in fact
get out! In my video I will show you 5 significant
"DUST CLOUDS" from Demolition Bombs exploding
INSIDE the WTC Towers.
These "Bomb Clouds" were located circa 20 and 40 levels BELOW the
"Crashl-evel" of the falling Towers. This mean that they are not just "dusty
air clouds", being pressed OUT by the weight of the collapsing floors.
No the "Clouds" of these detonations are LOCATED so many levels BELOW
the "factual Crash level" of the Tower, at the time they are "Visibly Exposed"
on the video clip, that they give full evidence of a Distinct Demolition Bomb
being exploded FAR BELOW the "Crash-Point-level".
Certain video-clips give full evidence that distinct
Bomb-explosions sometimes took place more
than 100 meter BELOW the "Crash-Point-level".
When I say "Crash Point Level" I mean the highest place where the
"Static Structure of the TOWER" is still intact during the Tower collapses
- at any time. The WTC Tower collapses from the top roof and continues
collapsing until it reaches the Ground level. The factual level (height)
of the part of the Tower which are still intact during the Tower collapse
can be measured in meters (at any time), but one must be very careful.
One should NOT confuse the height of the falling debris falling OUTSIDE
the Tower Facade - with the height of the "Crash Point Level". At the
beginning of the Tower collapse these heights are identical. But after a
few seconds the "Outside debris" would have fallen much faster and
travelled a much longer distance - than the "Factual Crash Point Level"
of the WTC Towers Tube structure would have reached at the same time.
The "outside debris" are in a "Free-fall" situation - whereas the "Tube
structure and the inner structures" are still exposed to a "composite event".
The Tower in general is not in "free-fall"! This is important - since this should
be taken into account when one try to see through the dust and estimate
at what particular floor level the collapse had reached at a given time.
Let me give you an example from the
video clip I will present in my video:
When I see a "distinct bomb cloud" being "pushed out" far below the
"Crash level" - I will "Pause-stop" my VCR. I will then measure the distance
in meters from the "Bomb Cloud" - to the level of the "Outside Debris" in
its "Free-fall position". If we say that this is 80 meters in distance - I will then
add an estimated distance of circa 25 meters, assuming that a certain part
of the Tower is still standing even though it is not visible to your eye
because of the dust screen created by the "outside debris".
But no matter what "collapse theory" you may believe in - and no matter
how many floor levels you chose to count in or omit - it is a fact that these
video clips gives evidence of several incidents of distinct bomb clouds
being pushed out many floors below the level of the collapsing part of the
Tower. Watch the video clips and you will see that the evidence is there!
Also the static of a strong "Steel-Tube-Tower" construction as the World
Trade Center - would by no means collapse in such a "Pancake collapse"
manner - as was the case on Sept. 11, 2001. Remember, that almost every
single "Bomb expert" in the world explained to the News medias on Sept. 11
- that there must have been several additional bombs placed inside the WTC.
On Sept. 12, numerous of Newspapers quoted several of such
"Bomb Experts" and "Building Engineers" who admitted that several
"ADDITIONAL Bombs" must have been placed and detonated inside
or under the WTC complex. The Airplanes and the Fire alone would
not cause such a complete demolition leaving almost nothing of
the Towers standing.
"ONE TON OF EXTRA HIGH EXPLOSIVES"
On Sept. 12 , the Danish "Bomb expert" Mr. Bent Lund said to the Daily
(Copenhagen) Newspaper "BT" - "that an estimated amount of circa
1 ton of "Extra high-explosives Bombs must have been detonated inside
the World Trade Center complex in order to make the Towers collapse
in the manner they did."
Then on Sept. 13, and in the weeks that followed, something "Psychological"
began to happen. And many of the so called "Experts" began to CHANGE
their original and Scientific Explanation concerning the CAUSE of the
Tower Collapse.
A period of "Psychological Rationalizing" began to enter the minds
of many individuals. Suddenly the "experts" began to speculate in
a more "Logical and Political explanation" to the Towers Collapse.
But science is NOT politics!
The Twintowers are constructed of steel - They have No ears - They have
No brains . Put another way: The Twintowers do not understand a political
explanation - nor would they react to political statements. The only language
they understand is the language of "Natural Science" . The Twintowers did
not feel, that the names of Bin Laden or Mohammed Atta etc....... had any
significance at all.
The Twintowers never knew anything about the fact that "Islamic jihad"
had been heavy marketed as the ultimate "Terror-scapegoat" to be feared
in the West - since the first attack on the WTC in 1993. The Twintowers never
asked themselves: "What would be the most logical explanation to our fall?"
But the "Public Opinion" and the "News medias" reacts in a much
different way. They want to present a "Logical explanation".
And what is "logical"??? ........ " LOGIC " is a very dangerous word!
The "Bin Laden Scapegoating" was well marketed before the Sept. 11
tragedy. So basically it was very easy to sell the world the story about
the "Wicked Islamic Bin Laden Terrorist" as being the "Sole Mastermind"
of the entire terror attack.
Who else could possible benefit from this ? (some people asked with
a "cocksure attitude" as if they had totally forgotten the concepts of
"macro-politics" - or simply forgotten the past "World History" in general).
The truth is that MANY "other types of people" would
BENEFIT from this! (And their name is not Bin Laden)
As a matter of fact Bin Laden and the Al-Queda Network (including the
Taliban and Afghanistan) were the real LOSERS of all this. On the other
hand the "Financial Elite" did really benefit from the "Sept. 11 Tragedy".
The Global NWO Elitists had "Golden Days" in the weeks and months
after the Tragedy - as they saw their secret political agenda unfold itself
in rapid speed in all Countries, USA NATO, UN, and EU, etc......
Many "Scientists" and "Other Experts" are also victims of this brainwashed
concept of "Political Logic" - which always speaks about the "outside enemy",
but never wish to look itself in the eyes and admit the existence of the
"enemy within".
I know that many "Scientists" and "Bomb Experts" have SUBSTITUTED
their original and scientific explanation - with a more polite and political
correct expounding of what caused the Twintowers fall.
In the evening of Sept. 11 many Scientist and Engineers began
speculating on the Scientific causes of the Tower Collapses.
But they also speculated in a "logical political understanding"
of the "Nature of the terror elements" in this world.
THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED IN THE MINDS
OF MANY SCIENTISTS THAT EVENING
They asked a very simple question:
If Bin Laden had already placed several Bombs inside the WTC
complex - why would he then risk the hijacking of 4 Airplanes?
Why would Bin Laden and the Al-Queda Network spend any
resources and logistics on the Hijacking - if they had already
placed several Bombs inside the WTC?
The Scientist would now become a victim of his own psychology
and make the traditional scholastic and manipulated political
error-conclusion, that: There were NO bombs inside the WTC!
(Even though his Scientific brain had just convinced him that there
were Several Bombs inside - he now chose to neglect this and fell
for the more comforting thought: That there was No bombs inside!
And that it was only Bin Laden and Nobody else !)
But the truth is, that a "Third Party/5th. Column
and their Secret TASK FORCE" detonated all
the many Bombs inside WTC.
THE "SOUND TRACK CENSORSHIP" WAS
CONDUCTED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:
2) Evidence of Corruption of Original Video SOUNDTRACK (of WTC
Tower Collapse). In my video I will give evidence that also the ORIGINAL
SOUNDTRACK which was shown on TV had been manipulated in many
critical scenes related to the WTC Towers Collapse. I'm convinced that
this SOUND TRACK manipulation was made in order to cover up the
TRUE SOUND of the "EXPLODING BOMBS" inside WTC.
A) The Video clips were often edited in a manner which did
not include the SECONDS PRIOR to the Tower Collapse.
Sound travels at a speed of circa 300 meters in a second. Had the
original sound been played and shown on TV, then the TV viewers
would have been able to calculate the distance and speed, and
then afterwards concluded that it must have been EXPLODING
BOMBS that were giving the loud noise, because the BOMB SOUND
could be heard BEFORE the Tower collapse had visually begun.
B) Also I will show evidence that "Distorted Noise" from the "street"
and loud noises from "Car Horns and Police Sirens" were later ADDED
to the sound track of the "Tower Scenes" - so that no TV viewer could
hear the loud noise from the Bombs exploding inside the Buildings.
I will present several perfect video clips from both
"american TV", "Danish TV" and the "German TV" -
which gives evidence that "distorted Sound PARTS",
that did NOT belong to the "Tower Collapse-scenes"
- were in fact PLAYED along with these video clips in
order to CORRUPT the original sound of the factual
"Tower event".
I can be totally sure of all this since I have detected a special Police car's
very specific "Horn and Siren" SOUND - and that this particular "SOUND
Bite" was PLAYED along with BOTH the Collapse of the "North Tower"
but also several hours later when the "7 WTC Building" fell down (later
on the afternoon).
In reality such a "repetition" of one particular sound bite - several hours
later - would be statistical impossible! FACT: It NEVER took place in reality!
So the ONLY explanation to this scenario is very simple:
The video "Tower SoundTrack" was MANIPULATED!
(and all this was done in order to hide the True soundtrack
of the Bombs being detonated just prior to the collapse)
-----------------------
IN MY 4 HOURS VIDEO I WILL ANALYSE
NUMEROUS OTHER INCONSISTENCIES
WHICH TOOK PLACE ON SEPT. 11, 2001.
Let me mention a few of them here:
MYSTERIOUS BOEING 747 JUMBO JET
- seen in Washington:
A "Mysterious Boeing 747 Jumbo jet" was shown on
TV as it flew in the sky above Washington on Sept 11.
This special Boeing Air-plane had 4 engines (we can therefore
be certain that it was a Boeing 747). In my video I will show a
picture of this mysterious Boeing 747.
It was shown several times on TV from Sept. 11 - and in the weeks that
followed. I have seen video clips of this particular Boeing 747 on both
Danish and German TV. The video clip with the Boeing 747 was typically
accompanied with the following narration:
"Later that morning in Washington,.... ANOTHER airplane caused
panic...." (the picture of the Boeing with 4 engines was then shown).....
Narrator: "But it disappeared from the sky over Washington and later
crashed down in Pennsylvania." (Source: "SAT 1" German TV)
Some reporters said that this Boeing 747
later crashed down in Pennsylvania!?
But the Pennsylvania plane "Flight 93" was
a Boeing 757 and had ONLY 2 engines and
not 4 engines - how do you explain this !!!?
As a matter of fact - according to the Official FBI explanation - all the
four involved Boeing airplanes on Sept. 11 - had ONLY 2 engines.
They were either Boeing 757 or 767 (which only have 2 engines).
So the FBI have some problem here!
AND WHAT ABOUT THE "MYSTERIOUS CHICAGO JUMBO
JET" WHICH ALSO WAS REPORTED ON SEPT. 11?
In my video I will show TV Transmissions which made a complete "Flight
path diagram" of this Boeing 747 (Chicago plane). But what happened
to this "Chicago airplane"?
THE PITTSBURGH PLANE CRASH
And the Pittsburgh Plane Crash (Flight "93"?) is also filled
with inconsistencies. Numerous local citizens reported that
they saw smoke from the plane long before crash-down.
On Sept. 11 the German TV (SAT1 and RTL) also reported that
"Flight 93" was shot down by US fighters. And the crash-site
in Shanksville, PA. is also mysterious.
The size of the debris were very small. (All airplanes parts were
found as small tiny metal pieces only) If this was the case, how
could the FBI then identify the alleged copy of a hand-written
"Suicide letter from Mohammed Atta" among the debris ?
Also some eyewitnesses reported that they had found debris
from the airplane as long as 8 km from the crash-site. This could
indicate that something had happened to the airplane before
it crashed down in Shanksville.
Not to speak of the "CNN News reports" about
EIGHT airplanes being involved in the hijacking!?
And some reports spoke about TWO air-planes
which disappeared in the State of TEXAS!?
<< REMOTE-CONTROLLED HIJACKINGS? >>
Could it be that there were several
RADIO-CONTROLLED Double Planes?
Could it be that there was one extra "Decoy plane"
for every single "real DOMESTIC air-plane"?
Could it be that all the planes that crashed
into buildings were in fact "radiocontrolled
decoy planes" with no passengers onboard?
(and that the real planes with passengers
onboard never crashed but were actually
abducted to some secret locations in USA?).
Such a "Double plane scenario" may sound a little too fantastic
to be true, but on the other hand the "logistics" would be much
more simple if the "domestic flights" (Flight No: AA11, AA77,
UA93, UA165) were not used for the terror attacks.
If they had instead used "double-planes" to hit the WTC - they
would not have had the huge problem with CHANGED FLIGHT-PATHS
of the four domestic planes belonging to "American Airlines" and
"United Airlines".
The chance of hitting the WTC and preventing the US airforce in
shooting down the "Four OUT of Route killer-planes" - would be
much bigger (if they used "radiocontrolled double planes").
One must remember that one of the most unexplainable aspects
of the "September 11 - War in the air" - was the total "Black Out"
of the "US Airforce" and the "US domestic-aircontrol" .
In some cases a total "Blackout" of more than
45 minutes - without any NEW flight reports!?
DID RADIO-CONTROLLED
AIRPLANES HIT THE WTC?
(A "Mysterious LASER Beam" can be seen on
the WTC Facade just before plane impact)
Watch my video clip of a "Mysterious LASER light beam" being
pointed on the WTC Towers facade just prior to the second in
which the airplane was crashing into the "South Tower" EXACTLY
5 meters below this "Mysterious LaSer Light ball".
PS: This video clip was taken by an unknown video-amateur, and
shown on Danish Television "TV2", but with no comments from the
Danish Newsspeaker. (They may simply not have noticed it!?)
The video clip was just used as some standard video-footage.
And apparently noone took any NOTICE of the "Mysterious Light Spot"
which suddenly entered the picture and "guided" the airplane in the
few seconds before it hit the WTC "South Tower".
I have asked the Danish "TV2" to confirm that the video-clip is real, and
that their raw-tape contain the very same "light spot". Also I have asked them
to give me the name of the video-amateur who recorded this special video.
But so far "TV2" Odense, Denmark - have not commented on this.
However TV2 did confirm that the video clip was shown on TV2 on
Sept. 19 2001, but they refused to give me the name and identity of the
man who recorded the video clip of the light spot on the WTC facade.
(If you have any information about the ID of this person - then please
contact Henrik Melvang)
Note:
I think that the said "Laser light spot?" may have been removed from
the OFFICIAL "airplane impact pictures" which they showed on the
various TV Stations on Sept. 11 (and in the weeks that followed).
Most of the live transmissions and their video-editing process
were controlled by a few TV production companies and some of
the huge News agencies. The rest of the TV world became victims
of this manipulated and biased political and corrupted
US-broadcasting-concept.
If you look at the TV's standard videoclip version of the "impact scene
on the South Tower" - you will discover that the "compressed and very
grainy colour" in these videoclips - could indicate that it had in fact been
run through a "PC-Photoshop Software program" BEFORE it was
released on World TV.
MYSTERIOUS CAR BOMB AT THE STATE DEPT.
Mysterious CAR-Bomb detonated at the "STATE DEPARTMENT" in
Washington ??? Was this telegram about a CAR bomb at The State
Dept. on Sept 11 a true information, or was it "disinformation" in
order to cover up for some other explosion which they did not want
us to hear about ???
My video contains much more than this. Everyone who has watched
it is impressed by the clear evidence presented in the video.
**************************************
INTERNATIONAL 4 hours Video-Version of:
"The Bombs which disappeared" (Part 1)
by Henrik Melvang
I have prepared a special English "short translation" and "Video index"
sheet for the English audience. This "video-index" will be written in
English and delivered on PAPER FORM - along with the original Pal VHS.
Also you will receive an EXTRA VIDEO TAPE along with the Danish version.
(You will receive TWO TAPES). The EXTRA TAPE will contain an English
explanation to all the Danish passages in the video, and I will give you the
latest NEW comments on the events discussed in the video. All this will be
done in my best English, and I'm sure that you will be able to understand
the "Empirical Evidence" presented in the entire tape (even though it was
originally narrated in Danish).
ATTENTION: My VHS videotapes were recorded in
PAL-versions only. (NTSC is not available yet)
Henrik Melvang, Box 86, 6600 Vejen, DENMARK.
- or simply BANKWIRE the amount of Euro 55, to my BANK-ACCOUNT
in Denmark: "BG-BANK A/S" Denmark: Reg. No: 1551
Account No: 3285704447.
And I will ship the video promptly, Thank you.
The above text was written by Henrik Melvang, Denmark
- on April 20, 2002.
ORDER MY 4 HOURS VIDEO NOW!
Contact Email: melvang@unmask.dk
Or use Order Fax: +45 74834085
---------------------------------------------------------------
The video was recorded in Denmark
by "Unmask Production", Henrik Melvang
Box 86, DK-6600 Vejen, Denmark, EU
Fax: +45-74834085, Email: melvang@unmask.dk
http://www.unmask.dk
http://www.bombsinsidewtc.dk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Michael of World-Action:
THE TERROR 'WAR' MUST STOP - URGENT
When I first helped network Henrik Melvang's work in July 2002,
by sending it to everyone in my address book and to all of the many
Net groups I am in, I prefaced the mail with these paragraphs:
----------------------
PLEASE SEND THIS EVERYWHERE. THE 'WAR ON TERROR'
HAS NO LOGICAL OR TRUTHFUL FOUNDATION. IT IS A LIE.
---------------------
FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT YET KNOW:
Since September 11th 2001, several hundred pieces of evidence have
circulated most areas of the Internet which show that the attacks of
September 11th last year, were completely organised by the highest
levels of American government. For those who don't know - I have to
tell you, you have been completely deceived.
I could have sent out... (this is going to everyone in my address book,
whether they're my bank manager, doctor, whoever)... I could have sent
out, literally, several hundred pieces of highly relevant information over the
past nine months, but I am sending this now - by the Dane, Henrik Melvang
- because it is a fairly concise overview of where a lot of the research of
evidence over the September 11th attacks has now taken us. 'Us' being
several million people who have communicated largely through the
Internet over the past 9 months.
Several thousand people have just died WRONGLY in Afghanistan.
Many, many more thousands may be about to also die WRONGLY in Iraq.
The truth has to dawn on you sooner or later that the world's leading
users of 'Weapons Of Mass Destruction' are the people who have taken
power at the highest levels of the American Government - several decades
ago - and have unleashed this power, already, all over the world, to the
tune of several MILLION deaths over the past 40 years.
This is no time to hang around and be 'cool' or being cynical in the traditional
British way - because matters are now getting extremely dangerous, for all of us.
I advise: be careful not to laugh at Henrik's reference to 'New World Order',
or that laughter may be to your cost later. The overall name of what we're
up against is not important. It is the wholesale lies, deaths and deceit which
is important.
YES. I too would like to live in a world where these things are NOT happening.
But they clearly are happening. And the only way we can achieve a sane
world, is to work together, or on our own, to get these things STOPPED.
Michael Irving
July 9th, 2002, World-Action, Isle of Man, British Isles.
Tel: UK 01624 812250.
--------------------------
--------------------------
|
|
Description here
|
Two years ago a project set up by the men who now surround George W Bush said what America needed was "a new Pearl Harbor". Its published aims have, alarmingly, come true. : John Pilger :12 Dec 2002
The threat posed by US terrorism to the security of nations and individuals was outlined in prophetic detail in a document written more than two years ago and disclosed only recently. What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world's resources, it said, was "some catastrophic and catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbor". The attacks of 11 September 2001 provided the "new Pearl Harbor", described as "the opportunity of ages". The extremists who have since exploited 11 September come from the era of Ronald Reagan, when far-right groups and "think-tanks" were established to avenge the American "defeat" in Vietnam. In the 1990s, there was an added agenda: to justify the denial of a "peace dividend" following the cold war. The Project for the New American Century was formed, along with the American Enterprise Institute, the Hudson Institute and others that have since merged the ambitions of the Reagan administration with those of the current Bush regime.One of George W Bush's "thinkers" is Richard Perle. I interviewed Perle when he was advising Reagan; and when he spoke about "total war", I mistakenly dismissed him as mad. He recently used the term again in describing America's "war on terror". "No stages," he said. "This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq... this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war... our children will sing great songs about us years from now."Perle is one of the founders of the Project for the New American Century, the PNAC. Other founders include Dick Cheney, now vice-president, Donald Rumsfeld, defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, deputy defence secretary, I Lewis Libby, Cheney's chief of staff, William J Bennett, Reagan's education secretary, and Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush's ambassador to Afghanistan. These are the modern chartists of American terrorism. The PNAC's seminal report, Rebuilding America's Defences: strategy, forces and resources for a new century, was a blueprint of American aims in all but name. Two years ago it recommended an increase in arms-spending by so that Washington could "fight and win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars". This has happened. It said the United States should develop "bunker-buster" nuclear weapons and make "star wars" a national priority. This is happening. It said that, in the event of Bush taking power, Iraq should be a target. And so it is.As for Iraq's alleged "weapons of mass destruction", these were dismissed, in so many words, as a convenient excuse, which it is. "While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification," it says, "the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein." How has this grand strategy been implemented? A series of articles in the Washington Post, co-authored by Bob Woodward of Watergate fame and based on long interviews with senior members of the Bush administration, reveals how 11 September was manipulated.On the morning of 12 September 2001, without any evidence of who the hijackers were, Rumsfeld demanded that the US attack Iraq. According to Woodward, Rumsfeld told a cabinet meeting that Iraq should be "a principal target of the first round in the war against terrorism". Iraq was temporarily spared only because Colin Powell, the secretary of state, persuaded Bush that "public opinion has to be prepared before a move against Iraq is possible". Afghanistan was chosen as the softer option. If Jonathan Steele's estimate in the Guardian is correct, some 20,000 people in Afghanistan paid the price of this debate with their lives.Time and again, 11 September is described as an "opportunity". In last April's New Yorker, the investigative reporter Nicholas Lemann wrote that Bush's most senior adviser, Condoleezza Rice, told him she had called together senior members of the National Security Council and asked them "to think about 'how do you capitalise on these opportunities'", which she compared with those of "1945 to 1947": the start of the cold war. Since 11 September, America has established bases at the gateways to all the major sources of fossil fuels, especially central Asia. The Unocal oil company is to build a pipeline across Afghanistan. Bush has scrapped the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gas emissions, the war crimes provisions of the International Criminal Court and the anti-ballistic missile treaty. He has said he will use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states "if necessary". Under cover of propaganda about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, the Bush regime is developing new weapons of mass destruction that undermine international treaties on biological and chemical warfare.In the Los Angeles Times, the military analyst William Arkin describes a secret army set up by Donald Rumsfeld, similar to those run by Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger and which Congress outlawed. This "super-intelligence support activity" will bring together the "CIA and military covert action, information warfare, and deception". According to a classified document prepared for Rumsfeld, the new organisation, known by its Orwellian moniker as the Proactive Pre-emptive Operations Group, or P2OG, will provoke terrorist attacks which would then require "counter-attack" by the United States on countries "harbouring the terrorists".In other words, innocent people will be killed by the United States. This is reminiscent of Operation Northwoods, the plan put to President Kennedy by his military chiefs for a phoney terrorist campaign - complete with bombings, hijackings, plane crashes and dead Americans - as justification for an invasion of Cuba. Kennedy rejected it. He was assassinated a few months later. Now Rumsfeld has resurrected Northwoods, but with resources undreamt of in 1963 and with no global rival to invite caution. You have to keep reminding yourself this is not fantasy: that truly dangerous men, such as Perle and Rumsfeld and Cheney, have power. The thread running through their ruminations is the importance of the media: "the prioritised task of bringing on board journalists of repute to accept our position"."Our position" is code for lying. Certainly, as a journalist, I have never known official lying to be more pervasive than today. We may laugh at the vacuities in Tony Blair's "Iraq dossier" and Jack Straw's inept lie that Iraq has developed a nuclear bomb (which his minions rushed to "explain"). But the more insidious lies, justifying an unprovoked attack on Iraq and linking it to would-be terrorists who are said to lurk in every Tube station, are routinely channelled as news. They are not news; they are black propaganda.This corruption makes journalists and broadcasters mere ventriloquists' dummies. An attack on a nation of 22 million suffering people is discussed by liberal commentators as if it were a subject at an academic seminar, at which pieces can be pushed around a map, as the old imperialists used to do.The issue for these humanitarians is not primarily the brutality of modern imperial domination, but how "bad" Saddam Hussein is. There is no admission that their decision to join the war party further seals the fate of perhaps thousands of innocent Iraqis condemned to wait on America's international death row. Their doublethink will not work. You cannot support murderous piracy in the name of humanitarianism. Moreover, the extremes of American fundamentalism that we now face have been staring at us for too long for those of good heart and sense not to recognise them. U.Policy influenced by Oil A new book by two French intelligence analysts claims that at the behest of U.S. oil companies, the Bush administration initially blocked FBI investigations into terrorism, while it bargained with the Taliban for the delivery of Osama bin Laden in exchange for political recognition and economic aid. In the book "Bin Laden, la verite interdite" ("Bin Laden, the forbidden truth"), which hit bookshelves in Paris yesterday, the authors, Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, claim that FBI deputy director John O'Neill resigned in July to protest the policy...and because he admitted that Bin Laden had nothing to do with that terrorism but the main responsible was “in high sphere of the governmentâ€...Brisard claims O'Neill told him that "the main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia." The authors say the U.S. government's main objective in Afghanistan was to consolidate the position of the Taliban regime and thereby obtain access to the oil and gas reserves in Central Asia. They say that until August, the U.S. government saw the Taliban regime "as a source of stability in Central Asia that would enable the construction of an oil pipeline across Central Asia," from the rich oilfields in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Indian Ocean. Until now, says the book, "the oil and gas reserves of Central Asia have been controlled by Russia. The Bush government wanted to change all that." But confronted with the Taliban's refusal to accept U.S. conditions, "this rationale of energy security changed into a military one," the authors claim. "At one moment during the negotiations, the U.S. representatives told the Taliban, either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs," Brisard said in an interview in Paris. According to the book, the Bush administration began to negotiate with the Taliban shortly after taking power in January. U.S. and Taliban diplomatic representatives met several times in February in Washington, Berlin and Islamabad. To burnish their image in the United States, the Taliban even hired a PR representative in Washington, Laila Helms. The authors say that Helms was well-versed in the arcana of U.S. intelligence agencies because her uncle, Richard Helms, is a former director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The last meeting between U.S. and Taliban representatives took place in August, five weeks before the attacks on New York and Washington, the analysts maintain. On that occasion, Christina Rocca, at the time head of Central Asian affairs for the State Department, met the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan in Islamabad. Brisard and Dasquie have long experience in intelligence analysis. Brisard was until the late 1990s director of economic analysis and strategy for Vivendi, a French company. He also worked for French intelligence, and wrote a report in 1997 on the now notorious al Qaeda network headed by bin Laden.Dasquie is an investigative journalist and publisher of Intelligence Online, a respected newsletter on diplomacy, economic analysis and strategy, available on the Internet. Brisard and Dasquie also note that Bush and his closest aides have strong ties to the oil industry. Bush's family made their money from Texas oil. Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, and the Secretaries of Commerce and Energy, Donald Evans and Stanley Abraham, have all worked for U.S. oil companies. Until the end of last year, Cheney was the CEO of Halliburton, a company that provides services to the oil industry. From 1991 to 2000, Rice was a manager for Chevron. Evans and Abraham worked for Tom Brown, Inc., another oil company. Besides the secret negotiations held between Washington and Kabul, the book examines the role played by Saudi Arabia in fostering Islamic fundamentalism, the personality of bin Laden, and the networks that the Saudi dissident built to finance his activities. Brisard and Dasquie contest the U.S. government's claim that it had been seeking to try bin Laden since the attacks on U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998. "Actually," Dasquie says, "the first state to officially prosecute bin Laden was Libya, on the charges of terrorism." "Bin Laden wanted to settle in Libya in the early 1990s, but was hindered by the government of Muammar Qaddafi," Dasquie claims. "Enraged by Libya's refusal, bin Laden organized attacks inside Libya, including assassination attempts against Qaddafi." Dasquie also discusses the role of the Islamic Fighting Group (IFG), reputedly the most powerful Libyan dissident organization, based in London, and directly linked with bin Laden. "Qaddafi even asked that Western police institutions, such as Interpol, pursue the IFG and bin Laden, but never obtained cooperation," Dasquie says. "Until today, members of IFG openly live in London." The book confirms earlier reports that the U.S. government worked closely with the United Nations during the negotiations with the Taliban. "Several meetings took place this year, under the arbitration of Francesc Vendrell, personal representative of U.N. Secretary- General Kofi Annan, to discuss the situation in Afghanistan," say the authors. "Representatives of the U.S. government and Russia, and the six countries that border with Afghanistan, were present at these meetings," it says. "Sometimes, representatives of the Taliban also sat around the table." These meetings, also called "6+2" because of the number of states (six neighbors plus U.S. and Russia) involved, have been confirmed by Naif Naik, former Pakistani Minister for Foreign Affairs. In a French television interview two weeks ago, Naik said during a "6+2" meeting in Berlin in July, the discussions focused on "the formation of a government of national unity. If the Taliban had accepted this coalition, they would have immediately received international economic aid." "And the pipelines from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan would have come," he added. Naik also claimed that Tom Simons, the U.S. representative at these meetings, openly threatened the Taliban and Pakistan. "Simons said, 'either the Taliban behave as they ought to, or Pakistan convinces them to do so, or we will use another option'. The words Simons used were 'a military operation'," Naik claimed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEAR FRIENDS.....
THERE IS A LOT TO SAY ABOUT ALL THAT YET....BUT I HAVE NOT TIME ENOUGH TO WORK ON IT....
BUT ALL I CAN SAY IS TO BE VIGILANT AND A SERIOUS WATCHER ABOUT MR. BUSH.
ON THE OTHER HAND....LOOKING AT THE LAST ELECTIONS RESULTS (nov.2004) ALL I CAN say is:
I DIND'T KNOW THAT A MAJORITY OF AMERICANS WERE SO DUMBASS...UP TO THAT POINT !
|
Description here
|
|
Description here
|
|
