AND NOW, WHAT ABOUT THE TWO TOWERS:

Open Letter To World Trade
Center Investigators
By :xxxxx
8-24-2002

The evidence is now compelling - the twin towers were BLOWN off their feet. The plane crashes and fires were but secondary distractions to the main event.

The towers were literally "blasted" off their footings at the beginning, and during the first phase, of their respective collapses.

The fact that the towers were seen "jumping" immediately before the collapse is documented on film by a helicopter camera that witnessed that event.

Massive explosions deep in the basements of the WTC towers clearly lifted - and dropped - the massive structures from their bases 70 feet below the surface.

The basement explosions that detached the central support columns from the bed rock, and dropped the towers, left extremely hot pools of molten steel (1535+ degrees Celsius), which persisted for days in the lowest basements (-7 level), and clear seismic tracks - that have yet to be explained.

However, the seismic evidence is quite clear: There were massive (and unexplained) releases of energy causing 2.1 and 2.3 magnitude earthquakes before ANY debris even hit the ground.

Furthermore, seismologists agree that the falling rubble would only cause minimal seismic disturbances, which it what the seismic record clearly shows it did. (e.g. Columbia University's Arthur Lerner-Lam's reports)

The largest blasts occurred during the first 5 seconds of the collapses - before any significant amount of debris even hit the ground.

As a matter of fact the impact of the "rubble" (we can no longer speak of large pieces) caused only relatively minor seismic shock wave signatures compared to what ROCKED the EARTH (2.1 and 2.3 earthquakes) at the towers' base from the beginning of the collapse until about 5 seconds into the 8 and 10 second collapses.

The massive seismic wave "spike", which occurred at about 4-5 seconds into the 8-second collapse of the North Tower was MANY times larger than the waves that marked the moment of impact when the "rubble" finally hit the ground.

DROP THE COVER-UP

Investigators: The cat is out of the bag. The game is up.

The evidence is now overwhelming and compelling. Scientists who continue to obfuscate and refuse to investigate the clear evidence of explosions in the towers will undoubtedly be considered by honest investigators, the public, and history, to be part of the cover-up. The steel evidence MUST be tested for signs of "twinning", the tracks left in steel of exposure to high-energy explosions. All steel from the basements must be tested for such twinning as well as radioactivity.

I, for one, would not want to be in the position of being involved in the criminal cover-up of this horrendous mass murder.

Those investigators who participate in the cover-up, whether actively or passively, whether by action or inaction, should expect to find themselves branded as quislings, of both their nation and their science.

The only sure path is to pursue the truth, wherever it may lead.

ABOUT THE "7 wtc" building More than one witness (including firefighters) have seen a CLEAR EXPLOSION on ground level, at 7, WTC Building...JUST SOME MINUTES AFTER AIRPLANES IMPACTS IN THE TOWERS. Someone can explain that ? It is EVEN VISIBLE ON A VIDEOTAPE....spreaded all around the world ! A BEAUTIFULL SOUVENIR...DESTROYED BY BUSH !!!--->
Look.... BOMBS INSIDE WORLD TRADE CENTER AND THE PENTAGON ----------------------------------------- PLEASE SEND THIS INFORMATION EVERYWHERE - AND ASK PEOPLE TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT - NOW - OR, AS CITIZENS OF THE USA OR UK, WE WILL BE PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT HAPPENS NEXT. (I have tidied up Henrik's use of English a little, but his English is much, much better than my Danish.) Michael, World-Action ----------------------------------------- On April 2nd., 2002 the Danish author and scientist Henrik Melvang released his NEW video documentary in Denmark. The video is 4 hours long and it's original title in Danish is: "Bomberne som Forsvandt". (NWO doc. 1:4) (Part 1) Translated title: "The Bombs Which Disappeared" Part 1. Or: "The Vanishing WTC Bombs of Sept. 11" Part 1 The video was recorded in Denmark by "Unmask Production", Henrik Melvang Box 86, DK-6600 Vejen, Denmark, EU Fax: +45-74834085, Email: melvang@unmask.dk http://www.unmask.dk http://www.bombsinsidewtc.dk The controversial "video title" above, refers to the numerous bombs which were detonated on Sept. 11, 2001 and which caused the collapse of both WTC Twin-towers and the Pentagon west section. But the title also indicates that these named "bombs inside" were almost forgotten by the Worlds News medias, only 5-10 hours after the "terror event" took place. On Sept. 12, nobody in the medias reported about these bombs anymore, or seemed to care about the existence of these huge bombs since almost everyone had already bought into the phony and pre-arranged, pre-staged and pre-scripted: "Bin Laden, Al-Queda, Airplane-Coverup, STORY" (with photos of 19 Arabs, and the phony Atta-Jihad-Suicideletter, etc.) Some people may have some difficulties in understanding WHY these "bombs inside" are so important - in order to understand the secret agenda behind the terror events of Sept. 11 (and our modern world in general). That is why, I recommend my coming 16 hours of videos concerning this very issue. ('Part 1' will be a good start). If you want to order the 4 hours video now, then please send me an email (or use order fax: +45-74834085). If you want to READ MORE about it all (before ordering the video) - More ENGLISH TEXT BELOW: EVIDENCE OF BOMBS INSIDE THE WTC AND PENTAGON: THERE WERE SEVERAL BOMBS INSIDE BOTH THE WORLD TRADE CENTER AND THE PENTAGON! The collapse of the WTC and Pentagon was not caused by the plane crash and the fire inside. Why do they deny the fact? The FBI and CIA officially deny there were several bombs detonated inside the buildings. THE REASON FOR THIS DENIAL IS VERY SIMPLE: 1) If they admit the existence of all these huge bombs, they can no longer maintain the "Jihad Matrix" as the convenient scapegoat theory. The "idea of an enemy" can no longer be solely personificated in the names of "Mohammed Atta" and "Bin (Frankenstein) Laden" as the "Enemy from outside" ("Al-Queda"). People would soon realize that the real enemy, is not from "outside" - but instead an: "Enemy Within". If they admit that there were bombs placed inside WTC, and that it was these huge bombs which caused the collapse of the twin-towers - they also admit that THEY ....... (FBI and CIA) ....... were INVOLVED. Because no one would believe that Bin Laden and the Al-Queda would be able to place so many bombs inside the heavy guarded WTC complex. Also people would soon realize that the Al-Queda network would not have spent so many resources in the hijacking of 4 or more airplanes, if they had already placed several bombs inside the WTC and Pentagon. The tremendous logistics involved in the hijacking of the airplanes, and the high risk of a total failure of such an airplane terror attack, would make no sense at all, if Bin Laden's Al-Queda Network had already placed several high level explosives inside the entire WTC complex. So seen from this point of view alone - any theories of an Al-Queda involvement concerning the "bombs inside" must be completely abandoned. The Al-Queda network and similar organisations would always be able to hijack an airplane now and then, and this could probably be done everywhere in the world in the future also. But they would never be able to co-ordinate the hijacking of 4 or more planes for over an hour, and by no means could they have placed so many bombs inside the WTC unless the FBI/CIA were fully involved in the plot. Consequently the "5th. Column of the FBI/CIA" (or other secret task forces) must have been involved in the detonation of all these bombs. These secret groups which are used and paid for by the "elite" are responsible of more than 80% of the total death toll, which again mean, that they are FULLY responsible of everything which happened on Sept. 11, 2001 (and what took place in the days before the attack). 2) All the numerous intelligence organization around the world have been infiltrated by the "illuminati" and the "freemasons" for the past 300 years or more. This conspiracy is not an american conspiracy - it is an international conspiracy with an international political and esoteric goal. The secret international masonic agenda: NWO! (Latin: "Novus Ordo Seclorum" = "New World Order" (NWO)) There is no intelligence organization in the world which has not been subject to the "masonic double state inside the State matrix". "The masonic mandate is: INFILTRATION!" (Harvard Prof. Gail Riplinger in her book "New Age Bible Verses"). And you name it - there is in world history NO exception from this very principle! Take a look at the most famous Intelligence Organizations in the world: FBI/CIA/IRS/NSA/Secret Service/FEMA/MI5/MI6/Scotland Yard/Mossad and the KGB etc... - They were all infiltrated by a "5th. column" from the very first day they were founded. Since FBI/CIA have the general supervision and jurisdiction concerning "Terrorism", they are obviously to be blamed if they fail to detect this "enemy within" (year after year). Also they are guilty of a "Joint-Terror-Conspiracy" if they had fore- knowledge of the terror event. Omission is just as bad as commision. On Sept. 11, 2001 - it became evident that FBI/CIA did nothing to prevent the Al-Queda and Osama Bin Laden's network from doing what they had in mind. Four or more planes were allowed to fly freely around in the airspace of Washington and New York - for HOURS without any kind of Counterattack. This is clear evidence of a joint conspiracy. Basically the Al-Queda Network is controlled by foreign intelligence. Bin Laden is a mediocre mind, who may see himself as an Islamic freedom fighter, but who was in reality unable to discover the huge number of "Agent provocateurs" and "Double agents" which infiltrated his famous "Al-Queda organization" - more than 10 years ago. The "Taliban rule" was also a creation of the foreign intelligence network, which was set up in order to establish a "scapegoat campus" for the future terrorist attacks. THE CORRUPTION OF EVIDENCE: Most of the Ordinary FBI/CIA employees are not a part of this conspiracy. But they will become guilty of high crimes if they participate in the corruption of evidence. Since Sept. 11 there has been no real investigation of the "crime scenes" at all. All the steel from WTC and the Pentagon contained an enormous amount of evidence. This "mountain of evidence" should be investigated, but only very little has been analysed. If real bomb experts had a change to analyse the steel and concrete, they would discover several "Bomb marks" from high explosives. As a matter of fact some experts have already reported about this. That is why the FBI decided to make a "total demolition" of all the "Crime scenes" so fast after the attack. Most of the Steel from the WTC complex was never analysed before it was driven away and recycled (melted). (PS: In Washington there has already been held a "crisis meeting" (hearing) in March 2002 in order to file an official complaint about this "corruption of evidence". The FBI are not allowed to melt any part of the steel from WTC, since it is a part of the important LEGAL evidence). Also the Pentagon crime scene was corrupted. Only few months after the attack the entire west section of Pentagon was rebuilt, and in the meantime the rubble was corrupted - so that no-one had a chance to examine the evidence of the Bomb explosions inside the Pentagon. (The "fast demolition pattern" of the FBI continues in the footsteps of WACO 1993 and OKLAHOMA 1995) Several Bombs INSIDE the Pentagon. The phony FBI theory of "Flight 77" is a FICTION! The official FBI explanation concerning the Pentagon attack contains a "phony story" about a Boeing 757 crashing down into the Pentagon Buildings westside. The wingspan of a Boeing 757 is circa 40 meters. And such a huge plane could not have flown in from the west and penetrated the west facade - WITHOUT first having broken several of the numerous amount of Light Poles and Traffic Signs which were surrounding the Pentagons west side. But these light poles were left unharmed. (Check out the pictures for yourself). This means in plain english : That there was no Boeing 757 which crashed down into the Pentagon on Sept. 11. Had this been the case, there would also have been a much bigger hole in the west facade of Pentagon. And what happened to the wings of the Boeing? Did they enter the small hole or did they disappear outside the facade ? No debris from a plane crash was visible outside the Pentagon - obviously there was NO plane crash ! And what about the TWO huge Engines of the Boeing 757? Did the engines penetrate the facade of Pentagon, and if so - what happened to the penetration holes of these TWO Boeing Engines? ...........NO Holes are visible on any of the live pictures. And what actually happened to the TWO Boeing Engines?............ The Fire-fighters who entered the burning Pentagon building saw NO debris..... and found NO Engines inside the Pentagon building. (Yet the FBI still claim they found the TWO Black Boxes!? Evidently the FBI is prepared to do everything to corrupt any of the involved crime scenes). Also the remaining walls in the attacked part of the burning Pentagon were destroyed only few hours after the attack. This destruction was made by a huge demolition Crane. The official explanation of this intervention with a demolition Crane, was that they feared that the building was unstable and that the roof may soon have collapsed. The truth however is that this was a "coverup-story". The real reason for using this Crane was that they could not promote the myth of a BOEING Plane Crash at Pentagon, if there was NO BIG HOLE in the Facade of the Pentagon Building. That is why they used the demolition Crane in order to make the hole in the Facade look bigger. The original holes in Pentagon was caused by the exploding bombs (and/or a Helicopter). But the size of these penetration holes were not big enough to convince the public that Pentagon was struck by a Boeing 757. That is why they used the Crane to enlarge the penetration hole in the Pentagon's west-Facade. After an hour a 10 meter big opening Gap, could be exposed in front of the Worlds News medias. Before this took place the Press was asked not to take pictures from certain angles. If you recall the first hours on Sept. 11 - you will remember that we saw only long distance photos/film of a distant burning Pentagon Building. (NO close-ups were allowed) Many from the Press complained about this, and asked themselves: What is it that they are trying to hide from us? The 10 meter big hole in the Pentagon facade was made to help promote the phony "Boeing Plane Crash Myth" of "Flight 77", which the FBI claimed had crashed down into the Pentagon on Sept 11. The FBI and the "Illuminati Shadow Government" wish to link the Pentagon Attack to "Flight 77" and then afterwards sell us the "decoy-theory" of the "19 Arab Hijackers". But the Official FBI history of the identity of the 19 Arabs, as promoted by the the FBI on Sept, 14, 2001 - has been proven wrong several times since then. (That is why FBI decided to remove the Faces and Names of all these 19 Arab Hijackers from their FBI website. Note: The "FBI 19 Arabs link" is no longer available. Try it out for yourself). Go to: http://www.fbi.gov (and "Search" for the Sept. 14, 2001 Press Release about "Hijackers/Images") The first Official reports of the Pentagon Attack was that something "Unidentified" had struck Pentagon at circa 9:30 (Washington Local time). As a matter of fact this Official theory of an "Unidentified Plane" crashing at circa 9:30 was presented by most of the big Newspapers here in Denmark (Europe) on September 12, 2001. Some other papers said circa 9:45 , but in general most Newspapers said 9.30. Later on Sept 13 - the FBI changed all this. Also the route of "Flight 77" was changed. On Sept. 12 all the Danish Newspapers reported that "Flight 77" flew from Washington "Dulles" to New York and crashed into TOWER 2 (the 2WTC "Southtower") at circa 9:03 (New York local time) But the next day all this had suddenly changed. WHY??? On Sept. 13-14 the FBI explained that "Flight 77" did not fly to New York, but had hit the Pentagon instead. Then they also changed the time from 9:30 to 9:43 (or 9:45). Obviously the factual and correct "Pentagon time" 9:30 - is very important ! Several Eyewitnesses confirmed that they saw "Smoke from Pentagon" at circa 9:30. And if there is smoke...... there is also........ (Fire)!? The FBI's claim about 9:45 was made to link the Pentagon Attack to Flight 77. But as I said before people had already seen FIRE and Smoke at 9:30. On Sept. 11, the (now present) Danish Foreign Minister Mr. Per Stig Møller was in Washington, and was therefore interviewed by "Denmarks Radio" DR "P3" early in the morning at circa 7:30 on Sept. 12. And he explained that he had seen a big cloud of "FIRE" and "SMOKE" from the Pentagon at circa. 9:32 (local time) Mr. Per Stig Møller also explained in the Danish Radio, that he had said to his friends after he saw the smoke, I quote: "I think that there has been a Bomb detonated at the Pentagon!" (Nobody believed that in the minute he said it, but later they also saw the clouds of smoke rising up from the Pentagon) This testimony of Mr. Per Stig Møller - along with thousands of others eyewitnesses who did experience, or must have experienced the same scenario - puts the "FBI cover up story" - in a very bad light. TERROR BOMBS inside The World Trade Center (WTC, Lower Manhattan, New York, USA) Special BOMB Testimony presented in my video: Watch the eyewitness testimony of more than 10 eyewitnesses who report that they experienced SEVERAL bombs INSIDE the WTC. Listen to the businessman, who came out on the street and explained that a huge bomb was detonated at Floor level 8 - inside the WTC tower. Also watch the policeman as he explains that they were buried twice by concrete inside the towers before any of the Twin-Towers had collapsed. (This is clear evidence of huge Bombs detonated inside and before collapse) Several bombs were detonated inside and under the WTC-complex before all of the SEVEN WTC-building later collapsed. Both the WTC Twintowers were exposed to heavy bombs being detonated inside and below - before the Towers fell down. Several Bomb explosions were taking place INSIDE the WTC and Bombs were detonated far below the Towers Crash level and these Demolition Bombs can be seen on certain and selected live TV pictures of the WTC Tower collapses. But in general the News medias that controlled the flow of video transmissions on Sept. 11 (and in the days that followed) - have tried to CENSOR most of the video clips of the WTC Tower collapse. (Manipulated video editing gives evidence of all this). On my video I will present evidence of both "TV Picture Censorship" and "Sound Track Censorship". The "Live TV Picture Censorship" was conducted in the following manner: 1) The original Video clips of both Tower Collapses were NOT always shown in its entire length. A) The Video Clips were mostly edited so that they showed an already BEGUN video fraction of the Tower collapse. The Video Clips should also have included the seconds just BEFORE the Towers began to fall (but these important seconds just prior to the fall of the Top of the WTC - were rarely shown. Less than 1% of the average tower scenes would include this). This censorship was made to prevent a "sound exposure" from the original bombs being detonated in the seconds prior to the start of the collapse of the WTC Roof-top. (Read more about the "SOUND censorship" below) B) Video Clips of the falling Towers were often edited in a manner that prevented the TV viewers in getting the "Full picture" of the entire tower collapse. We must assume that more than 1000 different video cameras were aimed at the WTC twintowers at ANY time. Some of these video cameras may have "Zoomed in" on certain areas of the falling Towers - while other cameras did not zoom in, but kept on recording in a "wide-angle" and "long distance horizontal position". Since we know that many of the big TV stations had several long distance cameras aimed at the WTC Twintowers at any time, it is very difficult to understand why we have seen only very few video-clips from these long distance camera shots. On the other hand the answer is very simple. These long distance shots give a "FULL Picture" of what happened to the entire FACADE of the falling towers. During my 1000 hours of video investigation I have found only very few of such "Full picture long distance shots", which showed the entire tower (from top to bottom). Most of the video-clips we saw on Sept. 11 (and in the weeks that followed) would be edited versions, which presented a "video-mix" of several types of camera angels/zooms/and close up/mixed long distance etc. Such bad editing however does not give a "Full picture" of the pattern of the falling Twintowers. I have seen several News-blocks which repeated the same "Video-mix" again and again - without ever giving the "Full Picture" of what happened to the Towers. Typically this is what happened in the general video editing: (An Example of the average "Video TOWER Mix"): FIRST they will show a "Zoomed in close up photo" of the collapsing TOP of the falling tower . (No Exploding Bombs are visible on such video clips since the entire WTC facade is not shown) In the NEXT video clip they will show a short duration long distance video clip of the entire Tower facade. (No Exploding Bombs are visible on such short video clips - since the short duration of this video clip did not show any bombs) In the FOLLOWING clip they will again "Zoom in" and show a "Close-Up" of the "falling debris". We will see a close up of steel and concrete and dust falling down. (No Exploding Bombs are visible on such close-ups of falling debris and dust since NO pictures are shown of the part of the Tower FACADE below. The part of the WTC facade which have not yet collapsed are not shown in this video clip). FINALLY they will "Zoom Out" and give you a long distance view of the collapsing tower, but this "Zoom Out" will happen at a time where the bombs have long exploded, and the entire scene is just covered up in dust clouds and falling debris. (No Exploding Bombs are visible on this last video clip - since it is all over!) COMMENT: You may say that you have seen some TV Transmissions, which did not edit the "Tower Scene" in this manner. This is true, and in my video I will show some of these few TV Transmissions, which actually did give us a chance to follow the entire WTC facade, as it collapsed from the TOP to the Bottom. But in general most TV stations did not show the ENTIRE WTC Tower facade during the ENTIRE duration of the Tower Collapse. As I said before I have seen many different TV stations video versions of the "Tower collapse", but in general 99% of the TOTAL AIRING of the Tower scenes did not give any evidence of the numerous of "clouds" from EXPLODING Bombs "popping out of the windows" of the WTC facade far below the crash level of the collapsing tower. This high number of 99% (of the total airplay) does make an important difference for the average viewer who had no knowledge of a conspiracy. The effect of TV is basically "exposure". But in reality the Tower Scene should have been edited in a much different manner - if we look at the "Photographic nature of the Tower scene". Usually when the TV News medias shows a controlled demolition of a building anywhere in the world, they NEVER forget to give the TV audience the "Full Picture" of the scene. They always give us a "Long Distance shot of the entire Tower scene". They may show us some "Zoomed in details" also, but they will never miss the opportunity to show you the "full picture" of the entire fall of the tower (or building). Every year the TV News medias show us such demolition scenes of various buildings. I have never seen a TV Transmission which did not give the "Full Picture" - have you? The "Photographic nature of the Scene" would call for a "Wide angle view" - so that the TV audience can see the tower falling in it's full length. But the Tower event of "September 11" turned out to be different! And this was not because the long distance cameras were not in place to shoot the "Horizontal Long-distance Tower Scenes". Never in recorded World history had so many long distance cameras focused on the very same subject as between 9:00 AM and 10:30? on Sept. 11, 2001. Why then is the obvious long-distance shoot of the WTC collapse so badly represented in the TV Transmissions? It totally contradicts the nature of the Tower Scene - does it not!? The answer to this question is obvious: Someone in the "editing rooms" did not want to give us the "Full Picture"! C) Commercial video censorship of various "amateurs recordings"??? We know that several video amateurs must have taken several good pictures from various angles and various Tower scenes. But did we ever get to see their video coverage? ....... in its ENTIRE LENGTH.......... and with ORIGINAL SOUND!? On Sept. 11 (and in the days that followed) many video amateurs SOLD their video clips to the big News agencies and huge TV stations. This again mean that the "entire video editing process" were now in the hands of the "Big Government". If someone wished to conspire on Sept. 11 - they had a perfect chance to do it in the "editing process" of the crucial video EVIDENCE which was now left at their disposal. The BIG News medias fully controlled the TV flow in the days after Sept. 11. But some crucial BOMB video evidence did in fact get out! In my video I will show you 5 significant "DUST CLOUDS" from Demolition Bombs exploding INSIDE the WTC Towers. These "Bomb Clouds" were located circa 20 and 40 levels BELOW the "Crashl-evel" of the falling Towers. This mean that they are not just "dusty air clouds", being pressed OUT by the weight of the collapsing floors. No the "Clouds" of these detonations are LOCATED so many levels BELOW the "factual Crash level" of the Tower, at the time they are "Visibly Exposed" on the video clip, that they give full evidence of a Distinct Demolition Bomb being exploded FAR BELOW the "Crash-Point-level". Certain video-clips give full evidence that distinct Bomb-explosions sometimes took place more than 100 meter BELOW the "Crash-Point-level". When I say "Crash Point Level" I mean the highest place where the "Static Structure of the TOWER" is still intact during the Tower collapses - at any time. The WTC Tower collapses from the top roof and continues collapsing until it reaches the Ground level. The factual level (height) of the part of the Tower which are still intact during the Tower collapse can be measured in meters (at any time), but one must be very careful. One should NOT confuse the height of the falling debris falling OUTSIDE the Tower Facade - with the height of the "Crash Point Level". At the beginning of the Tower collapse these heights are identical. But after a few seconds the "Outside debris" would have fallen much faster and travelled a much longer distance - than the "Factual Crash Point Level" of the WTC Towers Tube structure would have reached at the same time. The "outside debris" are in a "Free-fall" situation - whereas the "Tube structure and the inner structures" are still exposed to a "composite event". The Tower in general is not in "free-fall"! This is important - since this should be taken into account when one try to see through the dust and estimate at what particular floor level the collapse had reached at a given time. Let me give you an example from the video clip I will present in my video: When I see a "distinct bomb cloud" being "pushed out" far below the "Crash level" - I will "Pause-stop" my VCR. I will then measure the distance in meters from the "Bomb Cloud" - to the level of the "Outside Debris" in its "Free-fall position". If we say that this is 80 meters in distance - I will then add an estimated distance of circa 25 meters, assuming that a certain part of the Tower is still standing even though it is not visible to your eye because of the dust screen created by the "outside debris". But no matter what "collapse theory" you may believe in - and no matter how many floor levels you chose to count in or omit - it is a fact that these video clips gives evidence of several incidents of distinct bomb clouds being pushed out many floors below the level of the collapsing part of the Tower. Watch the video clips and you will see that the evidence is there! Also the static of a strong "Steel-Tube-Tower" construction as the World Trade Center - would by no means collapse in such a "Pancake collapse" manner - as was the case on Sept. 11, 2001. Remember, that almost every single "Bomb expert" in the world explained to the News medias on Sept. 11 - that there must have been several additional bombs placed inside the WTC. On Sept. 12, numerous of Newspapers quoted several of such "Bomb Experts" and "Building Engineers" who admitted that several "ADDITIONAL Bombs" must have been placed and detonated inside or under the WTC complex. The Airplanes and the Fire alone would not cause such a complete demolition leaving almost nothing of the Towers standing. "ONE TON OF EXTRA HIGH EXPLOSIVES" On Sept. 12 , the Danish "Bomb expert" Mr. Bent Lund said to the Daily (Copenhagen) Newspaper "BT" - "that an estimated amount of circa 1 ton of "Extra high-explosives Bombs must have been detonated inside the World Trade Center complex in order to make the Towers collapse in the manner they did." Then on Sept. 13, and in the weeks that followed, something "Psychological" began to happen. And many of the so called "Experts" began to CHANGE their original and Scientific Explanation concerning the CAUSE of the Tower Collapse. A period of "Psychological Rationalizing" began to enter the minds of many individuals. Suddenly the "experts" began to speculate in a more "Logical and Political explanation" to the Towers Collapse. But science is NOT politics! The Twintowers are constructed of steel - They have No ears - They have No brains . Put another way: The Twintowers do not understand a political explanation - nor would they react to political statements. The only language they understand is the language of "Natural Science" . The Twintowers did not feel, that the names of Bin Laden or Mohammed Atta etc....... had any significance at all. The Twintowers never knew anything about the fact that "Islamic jihad" had been heavy marketed as the ultimate "Terror-scapegoat" to be feared in the West - since the first attack on the WTC in 1993. The Twintowers never asked themselves: "What would be the most logical explanation to our fall?" But the "Public Opinion" and the "News medias" reacts in a much different way. They want to present a "Logical explanation". And what is "logical"??? ........ " LOGIC " is a very dangerous word! The "Bin Laden Scapegoating" was well marketed before the Sept. 11 tragedy. So basically it was very easy to sell the world the story about the "Wicked Islamic Bin Laden Terrorist" as being the "Sole Mastermind" of the entire terror attack. Who else could possible benefit from this ? (some people asked with a "cocksure attitude" as if they had totally forgotten the concepts of "macro-politics" - or simply forgotten the past "World History" in general). The truth is that MANY "other types of people" would BENEFIT from this! (And their name is not Bin Laden) As a matter of fact Bin Laden and the Al-Queda Network (including the Taliban and Afghanistan) were the real LOSERS of all this. On the other hand the "Financial Elite" did really benefit from the "Sept. 11 Tragedy". The Global NWO Elitists had "Golden Days" in the weeks and months after the Tragedy - as they saw their secret political agenda unfold itself in rapid speed in all Countries, USA NATO, UN, and EU, etc...... Many "Scientists" and "Other Experts" are also victims of this brainwashed concept of "Political Logic" - which always speaks about the "outside enemy", but never wish to look itself in the eyes and admit the existence of the "enemy within". I know that many "Scientists" and "Bomb Experts" have SUBSTITUTED their original and scientific explanation - with a more polite and political correct expounding of what caused the Twintowers fall. In the evening of Sept. 11 many Scientist and Engineers began speculating on the Scientific causes of the Tower Collapses. But they also speculated in a "logical political understanding" of the "Nature of the terror elements" in this world. THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED IN THE MINDS OF MANY SCIENTISTS THAT EVENING They asked a very simple question: If Bin Laden had already placed several Bombs inside the WTC complex - why would he then risk the hijacking of 4 Airplanes? Why would Bin Laden and the Al-Queda Network spend any resources and logistics on the Hijacking - if they had already placed several Bombs inside the WTC? The Scientist would now become a victim of his own psychology and make the traditional scholastic and manipulated political error-conclusion, that: There were NO bombs inside the WTC! (Even though his Scientific brain had just convinced him that there were Several Bombs inside - he now chose to neglect this and fell for the more comforting thought: That there was No bombs inside! And that it was only Bin Laden and Nobody else !) But the truth is, that a "Third Party/5th. Column and their Secret TASK FORCE" detonated all the many Bombs inside WTC. THE "SOUND TRACK CENSORSHIP" WAS CONDUCTED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: 2) Evidence of Corruption of Original Video SOUNDTRACK (of WTC Tower Collapse). In my video I will give evidence that also the ORIGINAL SOUNDTRACK which was shown on TV had been manipulated in many critical scenes related to the WTC Towers Collapse. I'm convinced that this SOUND TRACK manipulation was made in order to cover up the TRUE SOUND of the "EXPLODING BOMBS" inside WTC. A) The Video clips were often edited in a manner which did not include the SECONDS PRIOR to the Tower Collapse. Sound travels at a speed of circa 300 meters in a second. Had the original sound been played and shown on TV, then the TV viewers would have been able to calculate the distance and speed, and then afterwards concluded that it must have been EXPLODING BOMBS that were giving the loud noise, because the BOMB SOUND could be heard BEFORE the Tower collapse had visually begun. B) Also I will show evidence that "Distorted Noise" from the "street" and loud noises from "Car Horns and Police Sirens" were later ADDED to the sound track of the "Tower Scenes" - so that no TV viewer could hear the loud noise from the Bombs exploding inside the Buildings. I will present several perfect video clips from both "american TV", "Danish TV" and the "German TV" - which gives evidence that "distorted Sound PARTS", that did NOT belong to the "Tower Collapse-scenes" - were in fact PLAYED along with these video clips in order to CORRUPT the original sound of the factual "Tower event". I can be totally sure of all this since I have detected a special Police car's very specific "Horn and Siren" SOUND - and that this particular "SOUND Bite" was PLAYED along with BOTH the Collapse of the "North Tower" but also several hours later when the "7 WTC Building" fell down (later on the afternoon). In reality such a "repetition" of one particular sound bite - several hours later - would be statistical impossible! FACT: It NEVER took place in reality! So the ONLY explanation to this scenario is very simple: The video "Tower SoundTrack" was MANIPULATED! (and all this was done in order to hide the True soundtrack of the Bombs being detonated just prior to the collapse) ----------------------- IN MY 4 HOURS VIDEO I WILL ANALYSE NUMEROUS OTHER INCONSISTENCIES WHICH TOOK PLACE ON SEPT. 11, 2001. Let me mention a few of them here: MYSTERIOUS BOEING 747 JUMBO JET - seen in Washington: A "Mysterious Boeing 747 Jumbo jet" was shown on TV as it flew in the sky above Washington on Sept 11. This special Boeing Air-plane had 4 engines (we can therefore be certain that it was a Boeing 747). In my video I will show a picture of this mysterious Boeing 747. It was shown several times on TV from Sept. 11 - and in the weeks that followed. I have seen video clips of this particular Boeing 747 on both Danish and German TV. The video clip with the Boeing 747 was typically accompanied with the following narration: "Later that morning in Washington,.... ANOTHER airplane caused panic...." (the picture of the Boeing with 4 engines was then shown)..... Narrator: "But it disappeared from the sky over Washington and later crashed down in Pennsylvania." (Source: "SAT 1" German TV) Some reporters said that this Boeing 747 later crashed down in Pennsylvania!? But the Pennsylvania plane "Flight 93" was a Boeing 757 and had ONLY 2 engines and not 4 engines - how do you explain this !!!? As a matter of fact - according to the Official FBI explanation - all the four involved Boeing airplanes on Sept. 11 - had ONLY 2 engines. They were either Boeing 757 or 767 (which only have 2 engines). So the FBI have some problem here! AND WHAT ABOUT THE "MYSTERIOUS CHICAGO JUMBO JET" WHICH ALSO WAS REPORTED ON SEPT. 11? In my video I will show TV Transmissions which made a complete "Flight path diagram" of this Boeing 747 (Chicago plane). But what happened to this "Chicago airplane"? THE PITTSBURGH PLANE CRASH And the Pittsburgh Plane Crash (Flight "93"?) is also filled with inconsistencies. Numerous local citizens reported that they saw smoke from the plane long before crash-down. On Sept. 11 the German TV (SAT1 and RTL) also reported that "Flight 93" was shot down by US fighters. And the crash-site in Shanksville, PA. is also mysterious. The size of the debris were very small. (All airplanes parts were found as small tiny metal pieces only) If this was the case, how could the FBI then identify the alleged copy of a hand-written "Suicide letter from Mohammed Atta" among the debris ? Also some eyewitnesses reported that they had found debris from the airplane as long as 8 km from the crash-site. This could indicate that something had happened to the airplane before it crashed down in Shanksville. Not to speak of the "CNN News reports" about EIGHT airplanes being involved in the hijacking!? And some reports spoke about TWO air-planes which disappeared in the State of TEXAS!? << REMOTE-CONTROLLED HIJACKINGS? >> Could it be that there were several RADIO-CONTROLLED Double Planes? Could it be that there was one extra "Decoy plane" for every single "real DOMESTIC air-plane"? Could it be that all the planes that crashed into buildings were in fact "radiocontrolled decoy planes" with no passengers onboard? (and that the real planes with passengers onboard never crashed but were actually abducted to some secret locations in USA?). Such a "Double plane scenario" may sound a little too fantastic to be true, but on the other hand the "logistics" would be much more simple if the "domestic flights" (Flight No: AA11, AA77, UA93, UA165) were not used for the terror attacks. If they had instead used "double-planes" to hit the WTC - they would not have had the huge problem with CHANGED FLIGHT-PATHS of the four domestic planes belonging to "American Airlines" and "United Airlines". The chance of hitting the WTC and preventing the US airforce in shooting down the "Four OUT of Route killer-planes" - would be much bigger (if they used "radiocontrolled double planes"). One must remember that one of the most unexplainable aspects of the "September 11 - War in the air" - was the total "Black Out" of the "US Airforce" and the "US domestic-aircontrol" . In some cases a total "Blackout" of more than 45 minutes - without any NEW flight reports!? DID RADIO-CONTROLLED AIRPLANES HIT THE WTC? (A "Mysterious LASER Beam" can be seen on the WTC Facade just before plane impact) Watch my video clip of a "Mysterious LASER light beam" being pointed on the WTC Towers facade just prior to the second in which the airplane was crashing into the "South Tower" EXACTLY 5 meters below this "Mysterious LaSer Light ball". PS: This video clip was taken by an unknown video-amateur, and shown on Danish Television "TV2", but with no comments from the Danish Newsspeaker. (They may simply not have noticed it!?) The video clip was just used as some standard video-footage. And apparently noone took any NOTICE of the "Mysterious Light Spot" which suddenly entered the picture and "guided" the airplane in the few seconds before it hit the WTC "South Tower". I have asked the Danish "TV2" to confirm that the video-clip is real, and that their raw-tape contain the very same "light spot". Also I have asked them to give me the name of the video-amateur who recorded this special video. But so far "TV2" Odense, Denmark - have not commented on this. However TV2 did confirm that the video clip was shown on TV2 on Sept. 19 2001, but they refused to give me the name and identity of the man who recorded the video clip of the light spot on the WTC facade. (If you have any information about the ID of this person - then please contact Henrik Melvang) Note: I think that the said "Laser light spot?" may have been removed from the OFFICIAL "airplane impact pictures" which they showed on the various TV Stations on Sept. 11 (and in the weeks that followed). Most of the live transmissions and their video-editing process were controlled by a few TV production companies and some of the huge News agencies. The rest of the TV world became victims of this manipulated and biased political and corrupted US-broadcasting-concept. If you look at the TV's standard videoclip version of the "impact scene on the South Tower" - you will discover that the "compressed and very grainy colour" in these videoclips - could indicate that it had in fact been run through a "PC-Photoshop Software program" BEFORE it was released on World TV. MYSTERIOUS CAR BOMB AT THE STATE DEPT. Mysterious CAR-Bomb detonated at the "STATE DEPARTMENT" in Washington ??? Was this telegram about a CAR bomb at The State Dept. on Sept 11 a true information, or was it "disinformation" in order to cover up for some other explosion which they did not want us to hear about ??? My video contains much more than this. Everyone who has watched it is impressed by the clear evidence presented in the video. *************************************** INTERNATIONAL 4 hours Video-Version of: "The Bombs which disappeared" (Part 1) by Henrik Melvang I have prepared a special English "short translation" and "Video index" sheet for the English audience. This "video-index" will be written in English and delivered on PAPER FORM - along with the original Pal VHS. Also you will receive an EXTRA VIDEO TAPE along with the Danish version. (You will receive TWO TAPES). The EXTRA TAPE will contain an English explanation to all the Danish passages in the video, and I will give you the latest NEW comments on the events discussed in the video. All this will be done in my best English, and I'm sure that you will be able to understand the "Empirical Evidence" presented in the entire tape (even though it was originally narrated in Danish). ATTENTION: My VHS videotapes were recorded in PAL-versions only. (NTSC is not available yet) The Price for the TWO tapes (plus paper translation) will be: EURO 65, - (PS: This is a special and very low price) (Because this price also includes "Airmail shipping" and "Registered Mail + Postal Money Payment service Fee" etc.) If you wish to pay in ADVANCE with either a Cheque/Check or using "BANKWIRE" - then the price will be as low as only: EURO 55, - (if paid in advance). Please send your CHEQUE (in any Currency £ , $, etc.) to: Henrik Melvang, Box 86, 6600 Vejen, DENMARK. - or simply BANKWIRE the amount of Euro 55, to my BANK-ACCOUNT in Denmark: "BG-BANK A/S" Denmark: Reg. No: 1551 Account No: 3285704447. And I will ship the video promptly, Thank you. The above text was written by Henrik Melvang, Denmark - on April 20, 2002. ORDER MY 4 HOURS VIDEO NOW! Contact Email: melvang@unmask.dk Or use Order Fax: +45 74834085 --------------------------------------------------------------- The video was recorded in Denmark by "Unmask Production", Henrik Melvang Box 86, DK-6600 Vejen, Denmark, EU Fax: +45-74834085, Email: melvang@unmask.dk http://www.unmask.dk http://www.bombsinsidewtc.dk -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Michael of World-Action: THE TERROR 'WAR' MUST STOP - URGENT When I first helped network Henrik Melvang's work in July 2002, by sending it to everyone in my address book and to all of the many Net groups I am in, I prefaced the mail with these paragraphs: ---------------------- PLEASE SEND THIS EVERYWHERE. THE 'WAR ON TERROR' HAS NO LOGICAL OR TRUTHFUL FOUNDATION. IT IS A LIE. --------------------- FOR THOSE WHO DO NOT YET KNOW: Since September 11th 2001, several hundred pieces of evidence have circulated most areas of the Internet which show that the attacks of September 11th last year, were completely organised by the highest levels of American government. For those who don't know - I have to tell you, you have been completely deceived. I could have sent out... (this is going to everyone in my address book, whether they're my bank manager, doctor, whoever)... I could have sent out, literally, several hundred pieces of highly relevant information over the past nine months, but I am sending this now - by the Dane, Henrik Melvang - because it is a fairly concise overview of where a lot of the research of evidence over the September 11th attacks has now taken us. 'Us' being several million people who have communicated largely through the Internet over the past 9 months. Several thousand people have just died WRONGLY in Afghanistan. Many, many more thousands may be about to also die WRONGLY in Iraq. The truth has to dawn on you sooner or later that the world's leading users of 'Weapons Of Mass Destruction' are the people who have taken
LOOK AGAIN...... RUSSIAN AIR FORCE CHIEF SAYS OFFICIAL 9-11 STORY IMPOSSIBLE “As soon as something like that happens here, I am reported about that right away and in a minute we are all up, Generally it is impossible to carry out an act of terror on the scenario which was used in the USA . Posted 13 September http://emperors-clothes.com/news/navy.htm As one considers the terrible events of Sept. 11 and observes U.S. media reaction, so pervasive and consistently military that it appears choreographed, doubts increase. The following is from pravda.ru, a Russian language Website (politically centrist, nationalist). In some places the English translation is confusing, so we added alternate phrasing in brackets. - Jared Israel an act of terror on the scenario which was used in the USA . This was said by the commander-in-chief of the Russian Air Force, Anatoli Kornukov. - said the general straightforwardly. Kornukov did not specify what happened in Russia and when and to what extent it resembled the events in the US. He did not advise what was the end of air terrorists attempts either. But the fact the general said that means a lot. As it turns out the way the terrorists acted in America is not unique. The notification and control system for the air transport in Russia does not allow uncontrolled flights and leads to immediate reaction of the anti- missile defense, Kornukov said.“As soon as something like that happens here, I am reported about that right away and in a minute we are all up, said the general. ---------- As soon as something like that happens here, I am reported about that right away and in a minute we are all up, http://emperors-clothes.com/news/navy.htm
NOT IMPOSSIBLE: WTC: Aviators Comment In the immediate aftermath of September 11th, as the world was trying to come to terms with the full impact of events, some critical factors were overlooked. One was the possibility that the planes were actually flown by remote control. Now this may sound a little far fetched but it has already been done with aircraft as big as those involved in the WTC attack. On April 24th 2001 the Global Hawk, an aircraft with a wingspan as big as a Boeing 737, left Edwards Air Force Base in the US and flew across the Pacific to an Australian Air Force base near Adelaide. The aircraft was unmanned and monitored by ground based crews in the US and Australia. The flight of over 13,000 km established “robot planes” and the remote control of aircraft as a modern day fact. So could it be that the planes involved in the WTC attack were flown by remote control? Were the hijackers themselves hijacked and the planes that they thought they controlled actually flown by others? Again it may sound far-fetched but it would add another level of “plausible deniability”. And as we detailed in the previous issue US Intelligence knew of plans by Islamic extremists to hijack commercial airliners and ram them into high profile targets as far back as 1992; but did nothing, despite repeated warnings from other intelligence agencies. Were they in fact waiting to take advantage of a genuine hijacking by Muslim extremists, using it as a cover for their own sinister plans? Once again that may sound a little over the top but many experienced pilots, both civilian and military, have had problems with the WTC disaster as reported by the mainstream media. In the weeks following September 11th rense.com reported that military and civilian pilots had gathered together to discuss the WTC and Pentagon attacks. Troubling questions arose about the alleged pilot-hijackers of the four aircraft, all of who were supposedly trained on Cessna aircraft over the past year. One airforce officer remarked, “I seriously question whether these novices could have located a target dead-on 200 miles removed from takeoff point...-- much less controlled the flight and mastered the intricacies of 11FR (instrument flight rules) -- and all accomplished in 45 minutes.” The extremely skilful manoeuvring of the three aircraft at near mach speeds, each unerringly hitting their targets, was considered superb. As one Air Force officer -- a veteran of over 100 sorties over North Vietnam – put it, “Those birds (commercial airliners) either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or they were being manoeuvred by remote control.” Another pilot warned, “We had better consider whether electro-magnetic pulse or radio frequency weapons were used from a command and control platform hovering over the Eastern Seaboard... I'm talking' AWACS.” While another asked: “If there was an AWACS on station over the targeted area, did it have a Global Hawk capability? I mean, could it convert the commercial jets to robotic flying missiles”? A hotly debated question was: who would be in command of such an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS)? The Russians, the Chinese, the Israelis, NATO and the Americans all possess AWACS-type aircraft. All have the capability to utilize electro-magnetic pulsing (EMP) to knock out on-board flight controls and communications of targeted aircraft, and then, to fly them by remote control. Yet whoever took control of the aircraft, whether they were Russians or even Americans, the fact is that the mainstream media has largely ignored this possibility. Just as it has largely ignored the evidence that Princess Diana was murdered.
ANOTHER STAND-POINT: Who really were the WTC and Pentagon Terrorists? New Bin Laden tape will shed light on the truth by Miroslava Flores La Voz de Aztlan Los Angeles, Alta California - 12/11/2001 - (ACN) The government has promised that it will release, tomorrow, a video tape supposedly showing Osama Bin Laden admitting to planning and carrying out the WTC and Pentagon terrorist attacks. The video, according to Vice President Dick Cheney, was found at a private residence in Afghanistan and shows Bin Laden bragging and joking about the September 11 attacks. The video tape, according to Cheney, depicts Bin Laden saying in Arabic that he did not expect the twin towers to come down completely and joking about the fact that some of the hijackers did not know that they were on a suicide mission. There is no doubt that the tape will be carefully scrutinized by experts from all sides of the issue. There are groups that are questioning the government's version that it was Osama Bin Laden who was behind the planning and execution of the terrorists attacks in New York and Washington D.C. Some experts and scholars are proposing that the terrorists attacks were actually undertaken by the Israeli intelligence agency called the MOSSAD with the help of some rogue elements within the American CIA. These experts and scholars cite certain evidence that they say implicates Israel and Zionist international interests in the "mother of all terrorist attacks". Israeli Zionists have a long history of using terrorism to manipulate world events and it was Zionist terrorism against the British that eventually helped establish the Israeli Zionist state. On October 10, 2001, one month after the WTC and Pentagon terrorist attacks, two Israelis, one a MOSSAD colonel, were arrested inside the Mexican Congress with IDF issued Glocks, hand grenades and explosives. The incident has been totally swept under the carpet by high level Zionists in the Mexican government. The story was initially broadly covered by major Mexican newspapers, radio and two of the major Mexican television networks, but now all information concerning the case has been totally suppressed. There is no doubt in our minds that the Western mainstream media, including Mexico's, is now totally controlled by certain internationalist interests that are keeping certain information from the public and at times even resort to twisting the truth. It is in this atmosphere of lack of faith in the mainstream channels of information that the new Bin Laden video tape will be released. Most Americans will not question what our government and mainstream media will tell them. Unfortunately there has been too much brainwashing that has already taken place. Hopefully, however, there are still small groups of independent thinkers that will not be fooled. A growing number of college and university students and faculty as well as bright ordinary citizens are now "catching on" to the lies that have been published by the media to justify the war and aid to Israel. Some of us remember the Jewish Hollywood film called "Wag the Dog" in which an ultimate spin doctor, Conrad Brean (Robert DeNiro) uses his uncanny ability to manipulate politics, the press and most importantly, the American people. With the help of Stanley Motss (Dustin Hoffman), a famed Hollywood Jewish producer and his irreverent entourage, Brean assembles a crisis team who orchestrate a global conflict which saves the U.S. president's election campaign by helping to focus the public's attention away from a presidential scandal. Recently, George Bush had a high level meeting with Hollywood producers and directors to enlist their help in the war effort. How difficult will it be for Spielberg to fake an Osama Bin Laden video tape? Or how difficult will it be to twist the true Arabic interpretation of what Bin Laden actually said? Dick Cheney did not sound too convincing when he appeared on "Meet the Press" on Sunday TV when explaining how the government came about finding the tape. There are two primary reasons why the careful analysis of the video tape to be released tomorrow is so important. The real motives for the bombing of the Taliban has been questioned. There is clear historical evidence that the big U.S oil corporations have been pushing for the construction of oil and gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea region through Afghanistan to Pakistani harbors on the Indian Ocean. The Caspian Sea region has oil and gas reserves worth trillions. Dick Cheney was a principal working with US oil and gas interests to construct the pipelines prior to his election to Vice President. The second reason is that Israel is very anxious to deflect the discussion of the possibility that it was the Israeli MOSSAD that was responsible for the WTC and Pentagon terrorist attacks. There is a lot riding on the truth concerning the new Osama Bin Laden video tape to be released tomorrow.
AND ABOUT THAT VIDEO CLIP... CONSPIRACY PLANET LET ME TELL YOU THAT HOLLYWOD CAN DO A PRETTY WELL JOB ON SUBJECTS LIKE....: 9-11: Unanswered Questions Abortion/ Death Industry AIDS Al Martin Anthrax Fear/Scam Beyond the Beyond Bilderbergers Biowarfare Bush Crime Family Bush Dictatorship Catherine Austin Fitts Chemtrails Cheney/Halliburton Fraud CIA (Criminals In Action) CIA Drug Trafficking CIA-Nazis Criminal Government DoJ Dyncorp Crimes Enron Money Laundry FDA Scandals Federal Reserve Scam Fraud (Financial) Fraud (Military) Genetic Engineering Globalism Guns/Control Harvard Hijacked HUD Fraud Humor Illuminati Income Tax Slavery Iran-Contra Israel Killer Spooks Law Media Liars Media Whores Michael Riconosciuto Military Fraud Military Guinea Pigs Military Tech Mind Control Moon Landing Scam National ID Cards/Microchips New World Order Osama bin Scapegoat Phony "Conservatives" Phony "Progressives" Phony CyberWar Phony Drug War Phony Religion Phony 'Terrorism' War Princess Diana: Murder-Coverup Prisons/Slave Labor PsyOps Resist War Ron Paul Solari Action Network Suppressed Science USA PATRIOT Act = Treason Vaccination Scam Voodoo Science Vote Fraud - USA War on Gold Whistleblower: Barbara Hartwell Whistleblower: Ed Schooling Whistleblower: Oswald LeWinter Whistleblower: Rodney Stich WTC: Conspiracy WTC: Coverup WTC: Crime WTC: Enemy Within WTC: Who Benefits? News Links Forum Did Hollywood Script the Bogus Osama Story? by JARED ISRAEL (tenc.net) (Editor's Note: The pronouncement by Osama bin Laden reads like bad Hollywood script dialogue. It should also be noted that the CIA has an actual job description for writers of disinformation and fiction which the government-media protrays as "fact". It's called "strategic writer.") In 'US Army Gets Secret Advice from Hollywood,' the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) notes that: "American intelligence specialists are reported to have 'secretly' sought advice on handling terrorist attacks from Hollywood film-makers." (http://emperors-clothes.com/news/hollywood-i.htm ) Among said film-makers is Steven E De Souza, the screenwriter for the movie 'Die Hard,' whose plot deals with terrorists trying to destroy a big city skyscraper. The goal of this interaction? "In particular...the entertainment industry can offer [the Army] expertise in understanding plot and character, as well as advice on scenario training." Have the black ops boys by any chance lent their script doctors to Osama bin Laden?
LOOK AT THIS Subj [TheEagle-L] THE ENEMY IS INSIDE THE GATES Date 11/4/02 55552 AM Pacific Standard Time THE ENEMY IS INSIDE THE GATES by Colonel Donn de Grand Pré (US Army - Ret.) A dedicated group of experienced civilian and military pilots, including combat fighter pilots and commercial airline captains, just finished a marathon 72 hours of non-stop briefings and debate over the current crisis evolving from the use of commercial aircraft as cruise missiles against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 11 September. The so-called terrorist attack was in fact a superbly executed military operation against the United States, requiring the utmost professional military skill in command, communications and control. It was flawless in timing, in the choice of selected aircraft to be used as guided missiles, and in the coordinated delivery of those missiles to their pre-selected targets. As a tactical military exercise against two significant targets (world financial center and the citadel of world strategic military planning), the attack, from a psychological impact on the American public, equaled the Japanese "surprise" attack on Pearl Harbor 7 Dec 1941. The over-riding question If we are at war, who is the enemy? The group determined that the enemy is within the gates, that he has infiltrated into the highest policy-making positions at the Federal level, and has absolute control, not only of the purse strings, but of the troop build-up and deployment of our military forces, including active, reserve and National Guard units. PRELUDE TO PANIC The 9-11 activity and horrific destruction of US property and lives was intentionally meant to trigger a psychological and patriotic reaction on the part of the US citizens, which is paving the way for "combined UN activity" (using the fig leaf of NATO) for striking key targets in both the Middle East/ South Asia and the Balkans. The goal continues to be ultimate destruction of all national sovereignty and establishment of a global government. The trigger for the 9-11 activity was the imminent and unstoppable world-wide financial collapse, which can only be prevented (temporarily) by a major war, perhaps to become known as WW 111. To bring it off (one more time), martial law will probably be imposed in the United States. In each of the major wars of the 20th century, the financial manipulators (located in the City of London and New York City) had placed the US (and much of the Western world) in a monetary expansion mode, followed by an ever-tightening vice of a gigantic credit squeeze. We now have two ongoing and tightly controlled simultaneous events (emanating from the two symbolic targets of 911 1) Alan Greenspan, Fed chairman, promising to flood the market with up to billion in FRNs and to further lower interest rates, thus bringing about hyperinflation and dollar devaluation. Much of these multi billions in largesse will be dumped into the coffers of Wall Street, Defense, bankrupt airlines, insurance companies and into the willing arms of debt-ridden third-world countries in the form of debt repudiation (forgiveness). Call it bribery, in order to get these often reluctant nations to join our coalition of "freedom fighters" in "the war against terrorism". 2) Paul Wolfowitz, deputy Defense secretary, promised that the US will launch "sustained military strikes against those behind the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington". He said that the "military retaliation would continue until the roots of terrorism are destroyed." This bit of saber rattling was seconded by select NATO allies (especially Britain), and by our chief ally in the Middle East, Ariel Sharon, while Secretary of Defense Don Rumsfeld, with the blessings of Pres. Bush 11, is activating thousands of national guard and reservists, not only to guard the vulnerable airports, but to do fly-overs of our Nation's capital in F16s from the North Dakota Air Guard. Other National Guard units are being jockeyed into potential combat "hot spots" throughout the Middle East/South Asia and the Balkans. WHO IS THE ENEMY? Following is a summary of the near-unanimous views of the assembled military and civilian pilots concerning certain critical factors relating to the WTC/Pentagon hit of 9-11 Troubling questions arose about the alleged pilot-hijackers of the four aircraft, who were supposedly trained on Cessna aircraft over the past year at fields in Florida and Oklahoma. One General officer remarked, "I seriously question whether these novices could have located a target dead-on 200 miles removed from takeoff point...-- much less controlled the flight and mastered the intricacies of 11FR (instrument flight rules) -- and all accomplished in 45 minutes." The extremely skillful maneuvering of the three aircraft at near mach speeds, each unerringly hitting their targets, was superb. As one Air Force officer -- a veteran of over 100 sorties over North Vietnam -- explained, "Those birds (commercial airliners) either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or they were being maneuvered by remote control." Another pilot warned that "we had better consider whether electro-magnetic pulse or radio frequency weapons were used from a command and control platform hovering over the Eastern Seaboard... I'm talkin' AWACS." Another comment "If there was an AWACS on station over the targeted area, did it have a Global Hawk capability? I mean, could it convert the commercial jets to robotic flying missiles? A hotly debated question Who would be in command of such an Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS)? Were they Chinese -- Russians -- Saudis -- Israelis -- NATO ? All of these countries possess AWACS-type aircraft. All (except the Saudis) have the capability to utilize electro-magnetic pulsing (EMP) to knock out on-board flight controls and communications of targeted aircraft, and then, to fly them by remote control. One of the Air Force officers explained that we had already flown a robot plane the size of a Boeing 737 across the Pacific to Australia -- unmanned -- from Edwards AF13 in California to a successful landing on an Aussie base in South Australia. It flies along a pre-programmed flight path, but is "monitored" (controlled remotely) by a pilot from an outside station. He explained that the London Economist (20 Sep 2001) published comments from the former CEO of British Airways, Robert Ayling, who stated that an aircraft could be commandeered from the ground or air and controlled remotely in the event of a hijack. COMMERCIAL JETS AS GUIDED MISSILES An AP story, dateline Brussels - 7 Oct 01 -- "At Washington's request, NATO will soon deploy surveillance aircraft for anti-terrorist operations in the United States in response to the attacks on New York and Washington, NATO officials said Sunday, an unprecedented use of foreign military forces to defend the U.S. homeland." The assembled group of pilots debated why we would ask for foreign forces to fly AWACS over our sovereign territory when we have a fleet of 33 of them, of which 28 are stationed in Oklahoma. The debate also centered on whether such NATO surveillance aircraft were already here prior to 11 September. Could one of them have commandeered the four airliners? There seems to be wide discrepancies between what the Federal government is proclaiming -- and their media moguls reporting -- as opposed to the calm and reasoned and rational views of those men who fly the planes and defend the nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic. This writer has been a general aviation pilot since 1946. 1 have flown a variety of single engine prop aircraft since, and installed an FAA-approved airstrip here on my farm in 1980. Two local pilots periodically joined me for short hops; one, a Madison County lawyer, a graduate of the Air Force Academy, who flew for the Air Force before coming home to practice law. The other, Kent Hill, who lives with his wife, Carol, on a farm close to mine, is an American Airlines captain assigned to the European route. He was a lifelong friend of "Chic" Burlingame, They were graduates of the Naval Academy and flew F-4 Phantoms in Vietnam. Both left the Navy 28 years ago and joined American Airlines. Both planned to retire in 2002. Chic was the captain of AA flight 77, a Boeing 757, which departed Washington Dulles for Los Angeles at 8 10 am on I I September, with 58 passengers and a crew of 6. Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon at 941 am. "We were totally trained on the old type of hijack," Capt Hill said, "where you treat the hijacker cordially, punch a 4-digit code into your transponder to alert ground control you're being hijacked, and then get him where he wants to go, set the plane safely on the ground and let them deal with it on the ground. However, this is a totally new situation... Not one of the planes alerted ground control that they were being hijacked." How come? "The fact is, all the transponders were turned off on the doomed flights virtually at the same time." Look at their departure times -- two from Logan (Boston), one from Newark, another from Dulles (Washington DC) -- all between 8 am and 815. "Shortly after climb-out to flight level, their transponders are de-activated.. (they are no longer a blip on the radar screens). This is something that really needs to be looked into. The only reason we turn them off is so they don't interfere with ground systems when we land." (Note Transponders identify a particular aircraft in flight on the radar screens of FAA flight controllers located throughout the country. Various codes are punched into the transponder, one displaying, "I am being hijacked.") Although there is much talk among the various flight crews, Hill says they are not privy to any of the investigations into the events of I I September. "We're in the dark -- very much so ... They're playing it pretty tight to the vest." He is convinced none of the pilots had control of their aircraft when they were flown into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The question then becomes, who was really in control? "Even if I had a gun at my head, I'd never fly a plane into a building. I'd try to put it in anywhere -- a field or a river --and I'd be scaring the hell out of them (the hijackers) by flying upside down first," Hill said. In fact, the pilot has the best weapon in his hand when threatened with imminent death by a hijacker, namely, the airplane. Another airline pilot stated. "On hearing a major scuffle in the cabin, the pilot should have inverted the aircraft and the hijackers end up with broken necks." That none of the four pilots executed such a maneuver points toward the fact that none of them had control of their aircraft, but had been overridden by an outside force, which was flying them by remote control. As an old and not so bold pilot, I became more convinced that the four commercial jets were choreographed by a "conductor" from a central source, namely an airborne warning and control system (AWACS). They have the electronic capability to engage several aircraft simultaneously, knock out their on-board flight controls by EMP (electro-magnetic pulsing) and assume command and remote control of these targeted aircraft. As we consider all the options -- and enemies -- who performed this act of war, whether from China, Russia, an Islamic country, or from NATO, we must also consider that the enemy may be within the gates. If so, then we are dealing with high treason. The same source sent another email to me Subj OVERVIEW Date 10/23/2001 82556 PM Pacific Daylight Time OVERVIEW I want to start out by responding to that tiny percentage of negative email I receive that accuses me of being anti American. I'm not. I think America is a great place, and the American people by and large are to be admired. What I am against is any government that lies to its people. This includes the government of the United States which, contrary to Bill Clinton's comments on the matter, is not the same thing as the country. The country is the people. The country is the land. The country is those who build, teach, heal, grow, manufacture, and along the way raise a family. The United States is not found in the marble buildings along the Potomac. The United States is found in the homes and hearts of 266 million Americans. The government, its self delusions of grandeur aside, is nothing but a custodian, and a temporary one, hired by the people to care for our nation, and if that custodian fails in that job, like any menial, they should be replaced. Our nation did just that once before, in 1776, and it must be remembered that those who were called "Patriot" were those who stood with the people of the nation, not with the corrupted government. There is no provision in the Constitution that authorizes the government, as custodian of the nation, to lie to the people. It's just not in there. And yet the government of the United States has been caught repeatedly lying to the people of the nation in recent years, lying about Vince Foster , TWA 800, Waco , Martin Luther King , John F. Kennedy , The Oklahoma City Bombing , and others too numerous to mention. Suffice it to say that if the government of the United States finds itself with a credibility problem, it has only itself to blame. When the government of the United States lies to the people, it acts illegally and un-Constitutionally and by the strict interpretation of that document ceases to be the legal government of the land. But let us set that aside for the moment and look at why the US Government lies to the people and what such lies have accomplished in the past. Only then can we understand why the reasoning citizen must have serious doubt we are being told the truth by the government in the present case. Some of the biggest lies told by the government of the United States are those used to initiate a war. Modern pundits keep equating the attacks of 9/11 to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. This is a slippery, indeed dangerous analogy, since it has been proven in recent years, by way of recently declassified documents, that FDR deliberately maneuvered Japan into the attack on Pearl Harbor and kept the Hawaii commanders from knowing of the attack so that there would be plenty of dead bodies with which to enrage Americans into support of a war that as of December 6th, 1941, nobody wanted. American boys, shouting "Remember Pearl Harbor", marched off to war. Many did not come back. The Spanish/American war was likewise started with deception. The Hearst Newspapers flooded the land with stories of Spanish abuses of the Cuban people; stories which turned out to be fictional and which were published solely to fan the flames of a war, not for the benefit of the Cuban people, but to enlarge American territory and influence. When USS Maine exploded in Havana Harbor, the Captain of that ship insisted that the explosion was not the result of any attack. But he was shouted down by the press, and American boys, shouting "Remember The Maine", marched off to war. Many did not come back. And all because of a lie. In 1975, a review of the evidence by admiral Hyman Rickover, the father of the modern nuclear Navy, concluded that there hadn't been any Spanish mine at all, just as the Maine's Captain had reported. The ships had suffered a fire in a coal bunker, detonating the ship's magazine, imprudently located nearby. The same with the Gulf of Tonkin. Even as Johnson exhorted the American people to respond to the torpedo attack on the Maddox, Johnson knew there hadn't really been any torpedoes, not had the USS Maddox been as innocent as claimed. American boys again marched off to war. Many did not come back. Following the Bay of Pigs, which was by any definition an invasion of a foreign nation, the US Joint Chiefs proposed staging fake terrorist attacks that would be blamed on Cuba, to build support for a second invasion. Of course, there is nothing new about politicians using terror on their own citizens to get what they want. The trick goes back to Roman times, and even Hitler found it useful. So, let's take a moment to push aside those flags being held in front of our eyes like blindfold and take a close look at the current situation. The United States government, despite nice sounding speeches about freedom and Democracy (sic This author should have said Republics) , has a record of overthrowing actual working Democracies (sic This author should have said Republics) and supporting outright dictatorships. The US, for example, backed Cuban Dictator Batista, Chile's Pinochet, the Shah of Iran, and the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos, to name just a few. The US backed these regimes because the dictators were willing to do favors for American multi-national corporations. Batista, for example, kept the prices of Cuban agricultural products below the prevailing market rate. This made American companies like United Fruit and PepsiCo more profitable, at the expense of the Cuban farmers, who eventually revolted, bringing Castro to power. Castro let the market set the price of Cuban produce, whereupon the United States declared an embargo and invaded at the Bay of Pigs. Then we wonder why the Cuban people may not like us. Another classic example of US foreign policy as it really is was South America. Chile had a working democracy under Allende. But US corporate interests saw a greater chance for profits if the Democracy (sic This author should have said Republics) were to be replaced by a dictator friendly to US interests. This led to the US backed coup, complete with torture squads trained by US experts. Henry Kissenger flat out stated that the United States had a right to intervene in any Democracy (sic This author should have said Republics) that voted contrary to American interests, adding, "The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves." Same deal in Iran. The US Government backed the Shah of Iran. The rich got richer, the poor got poorer (same as in the United States) and the people of Iran revolted, bringing the Ayatollah Khomeini to power. Iran was our friend, now it's our enemy. The same with Iraq, once our friend, and now our enemy. Indeed, the United States keeps switching sides so often, with the American people expected to follow along like lemmings, that one is reminded of George Orwell's "1984" in which the perpetually warring nations are always changing allegiance, and the war weary people wake up one morning to be told, "Eastasia is our friend. Eastasia has always been our friend. Pacifica is the enemy." This brings us to Osama Bin Laden. Osama is the modern equivalent of Orwell's "Emmanual Goldstien", the boogie man on whom the government blames everything. Even though careful observers have long known the United States economy was poised for a major decline, the media is spinning the current economic woes as a direct result of the attacks on the World Trade Towers, in the hopes that the general public will be stupid enough to believe it. If Orwell is not to your taste, then let's try L. Frank Baum and the "Wizard Of Oz", who used a paper mache' mask to scare Dorothy Gale into doing war with the Wicked Witch of the West, something farm girls would not normally be wise to do. After all, witches have air superiority! Likewise, Osama appears to be a manufactured monster, designed to scare us into doing things we otherwise would not so, including support a war, cease criticizing the government, and surrender our freedoms. Contrary to the public media image of Osama, he is not a lifelong religious fanatic. At the time the United States covert intervention in Afghanistan triggered the Soviet invasion , Osama, like the rest of his family, was living a westernized lifestyle. One of Osama's brothers was a business partner with the son of the then vice-president and former head of the CIA, George H. W. Bush. The CIA needed a front man in Afghanistan to oppose the Soviets, since Vietnam was too fresh a memory for the American people to tolerate another war, especially since the lid had just been blown off of the COINTELPRO scandal , revealing the criminal actions the FBI had engaged in to silence opposition to that war. So, trained and financed by the CIA, Osama quit being a westernized Saudi and seemingly overnight became a fanatical muslim and financier/leader of the fight against the Soviets, waging an indirect war on behalf of the United States. Osama was a creation of the CIA and we only have the CIA's word that Osama isn't still in their employ. However, as another CIA asset, David Ferrie, pointed out just prior to his own assassination, you don't leave the agency. Once you are in, you are in for life! Afghanistan is an interesting place. It has natural gas, petroleum, coal, copper, chromite, talc, barites, sulfur, lead, zinc, iron ore, salt, precious and semiprecious stones, and more opium than the Burmese Golden Triangle. It is also one of the most deadly places on Earth, having destroyed every invading army since the time of Alexander the Great! Afghanistan also sits on the proposed route for an oil pipeline which would allow the vast oil reserves sitting under the Caspian Sea to be brought to market, and it is no secret that a consortium of American oil companies want to build that pipeline. However, as John J. Maresca, vice president of international relations, Unocal Corporation, flat out told Congress in 1998, the pipeline would not be built until the Taliban was removed as the government in Afghanistan, even though the United States had installed the Taliban as part of the anti-Soviet strategy. When one considers the size of the Caspian oil fields, estimated at about 500 years' worth at present rates of consumption, one finds ample motive to start a war of conquest for that wealth. Compared to the trillions of dollars in oil profits which will flow from that pipeline stretching across Afghanistan, the cost of new World Trade Towers and a few thousand lives is a small price to pay to those who lust for wealth beyond dreams of avarice. Long before the attacks on the World Trade Towers, the United States was already announcing that there would be a war. While the American people were kept distracted by "All Condit All The Time" in the American press, the foreign press was reporting as early as March 2001 that the United States was planning to invade Afghanistan in October. and here it is, October. and here the United States is invading. and just like with FDR, a provocation occurred just when the government of the United States most needed one to anger the people into support of a war for oil. No sooner had the planes crashed into the World Trade Towers than the media was reporting official statements of suspicion that Osama Bin Laden was behind the attacks. The FBI issued names of suspected hijackers, none of which appeared on the actual passenger lists, and all based on what the FBI admits were forged IDs using stolen identities. Moreover, the men used those stolen identities the night before the attacks to visit strip bars, making so much noise that they would have to be noticed, ensuring that the credit card slips using the stolen names would be turned over to police. When Flight Attendant Madeline Sweeney phoned the ground from her hijacked plane, she gave the seat numbers of the hijackers. The passengers assigned to those seats do not appear on the FBI's list of suspects. Then there was that suitcase, appearing out of nowhere and assumed to have been left off of one of the crashed planes by accident, containing a flight manual, a Koran, and a handwritten letter which any scholar of Islam would recognize was written by someone ignorant of the religion. In short, the evidence that purports to link the attacks on the World Trade Towers with Osama appears to be planted, with the scene of the crime looking like the set of a cheap detective movie, with a vital clue always carefully positioned within camera view. Because of the phony IDs, we do not really know who was on those airplanes, or who they worked for. But it is very obvious who we are all supposed to blame; the people sitting on that oil pipeline right of way! So great is the rush to war in Afghanistan that Osama has himself almost become secondary in the media campaign to sell us all on hatred of the Afghani people. Indeed it isn't Osama who terrorizes Americans, it is the American media, waving fear all over the place. Yes, Anthrax is nasty, but would a real anthrax attack harm so few people? More people have been gunned down in Washington DC in the last 6 weeks than have died by anthrax. More people are sick with Dengue fever on Maui than are sick with Anthrax. Yet Anthrax, and the fear it is designed to cause, get the headlines, to keep the public scared, so scared that they cannot think. Because once the people stop being terrorized by the media and start to think, they'll realize that it makes no more moral sense to bomb the Afghani people over what crimes Osama has done than it makes to bomb people of Chicago over the crimes the mafia does. And once the American people realize this, they'll start to wonder what the real reason for bombing the Afghani people might be. Then they'll start paying attention to John J. Maresca's comments before congress about that oil pipeline. Then the American people will notice those foreign news articles that announced the US invasion of Afghanistan last spring. Then the American people will realize that the timing of the attacks on the World Trade Towers is just a little too convenient to the already scheduled invasion. And that is when the American people will realize that, once again, they are being lied to to swindle them out of their support for a war, a war not fought for moral principle but for profit, profit from oil paid for in the blood of our children.
and now...what else: BUSH CAUGHT IN A LIE ABOUT WTC ATTACKS http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/04/se.04.html is a transcript of President Bush's comments regarding the day of the attacks on the World Trade Towers. Towards the bottom of the transcript is the following quote. (Note: Some readers are reporting that the version of the CNN transcriopt they see in some parts of the country has been edited to remove the following comment. George Orwell would be proud!) QUESTION: One thing, Mr. President, is that you have no idea how much you've done for this country, and another thing is that how did you feel when you heard about the terrorist attack? BUSH: Well... (APPLAUSE) Thank you, Jordan (ph). Well, Jordan (ph), you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident." But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it, and I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my chief who was sitting over here walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower. America's under attack." There is a problem with the above statement. There was no live video coverage of the first plane hitting the tower. There couldn't be. Video of that first plane hitting the tower did not surface until AFTER the second plane had hit. Bush is lying through his teeth here. Even though Bush is not a very good pilot (he was taken off of flight status for failure to take a medical exam which included a drug test), it would be silly to assume that a passenger jet hitting the WTC in clear weather was pilot error. The only other known impact between an aircraft and a New York skyscraper was when a military airplane crashed into the Empire State Building in a heavy fog. Because of that incident, there are mandatory altitude minimums over the island. If Bush really did see an airplane on TV hitting the World Trade Towers, then he saw that the aircraft was under control at the time. And, it must be remembered that even after andy informed Bush of the second impact, and by his own admission Bush knew we were being attacked, he continued to read to the classroom full of children. Just think about that for a while. Confirmation of Bush's comments is also at http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011204-17.html and http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,11209,612354,00.html ------------------------------- The history the government hopes you DON'T learn! If the US Government finds itself with a credibility problem, they only have themselves to blame! Our nation is in deep doodoo! Bankrupt, the world's largest debtor nation, and with our manufacturing ability lost to other countries, the economic outlook is not quite as rosy as the government would have you believe. Martin Luther King - The fatal shot was NOT fired from the rooming house! In this article written by Ted Wilburn, new evidence emerges that the shot that killed Dr. Martin Luther King did not come from the rooming house where James Earl Ray was staying, as has been claimed by the government. The Death Of Vincent Foster This is the page that started this entire web site, concerning the evidence found in official files proving that there was a cover-up in the death of White House deputy council Vincent Foster. The Death Of John Kennedy Americans are the most lied-to people on Earth, and one of the biggest lies of the last century was the claim that John F. Kennedy was assasinated by a single lone gunman. In this section of the website, photographic evidence shows that Lee Oswald was at street level the moment of the killing, and that Kennedy's Secret Service deliberately did not intervene in the killing. The shoot down of TWA 800. Over 150 eyewitnesses saw an object rise up from the ocean in the area of an ongoing neval weapons test and streak towards TWA 800 just before it ecploded. NTSB documents and court records prove that lab tests were rigged and the results lied about to conceal evidence of a military missile accident. THE FAMOUS "DEAD BODIES" LIST. An unusually large number of people connected to the Clintons have met with suspicious deaths over the years. Here is a list. The Oklahoma Bombing The government insists that Timothy McVegh acted alone in blowing up the Murrah Federal Building with a truck full of fertilizer. But seismic data, CNN reports, eyewitnesses, sound recordings, and even the Army's weapons lab all confirm that there had to be additional "cutter" charges involved. Nobody has yet explained why a second Ryder truck was hidden in a secret military base near Oklahoma City just weeks before the bombing. COINTELPRO: THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF THE FBI. Starting in the 60s and continuing to the present, the FBI has engaged in operations to sabotage legitimate dissent, disrupt political opposition, and stifle the free expression of thoughts and idea critical of the government. Exposed by a leak during the 70s, the FBI's operation COINTELPRO reveals that the FBI routinely lies, steals, and commits other crimes against the general public, for the purpose of denying them their basic Constitutional rights. OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD: THE SUBVERSION OF THE PRESS BY CIA. Think we have a free press? Not since the end of WW2 when the CIA began to infiltrate the top levels of all media operations with their agents. ECHELON: YES VIRGINIA, THERE REALLY IS A GOVERNMENT SYSTEM THAT READS ALL YOUR EMAIL! Recently exposed in a series of hearings by the European Union, ECHELON is a system operated by the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on all your communicatyions. A case study in Seattle shows that this pilfered information is not used to fight crime, but to grant business advantages to favored political supporters. Many years ago, men of strong mind, strong will and strong character used to meet in The Green Dragon Tavern . Coming together secretly, and often late at night, they met upstairs in the Long Room. Here . . . they planned the destiny of our country, and plotted the course of freedom which we now sail. ------------------------------------------------------------------ HOME • Chronology of Terror • Bibliographies • Valuable Websites • About This Site • SITE MAP ACTION • NEWS • Solutions • Candles in the darkness • Revealing Quotes 1 2 3 • Letters • SEARCH “The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media.” — William Colby former Director of the CIA The CIA, Insider Trading and the World Trade Center Terror Attack Bibliography • Related pages • Related sites Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA’s Highest Ranks CIA Executive Director “Buzzy” Krongard Managed Firm that Handled “Put” Options on UAL by Michael C. Ruppert From The Wilderness Publications - www.copvcia.com http://www.copvcia.com/stories/oct_2001/krongard.html FTW, October 9, 2001 — Although uniformly ignored by the mainstream U.S. media, there is abundant and clear evidence that a number of transactions in financial markets indicated specific (criminal) foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. In the case of at least one of these trades — which has left a .5 million prize unclaimed — the firm used to place the “put options” on United Airlines stock was, until 1998, managed by the man who is now in the number three Executive Director position at the Central Intelligence Agency. Until 1997 A.B. “Buzzy” Krongard had been Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown. A.B. Brown was acquired by Banker’s Trust in 1997. Krongard then became, as part of the merger, Vice Chairman of Banker’s Trust-AB Brown, one of 20 major U.S. banks named by Senator Carl Levin this year as being connected to money laundering. Krongard’s last position at Banker’s Trust (BT) was to oversee “private client relations.” In this capacity he had direct hands-on relations with some of the wealthiest people in the world in a kind of specialized banking operation that has been identified by the U.S. Senate and other investigators as being closely connected to the laundering of drug money. Krongard (re?) joined the CIA in 1998 as counsel to CIA Director George Tenet. He was promoted to CIA Executive Director by President Bush in March of this year. BT was acquired by Deutsche Bank in 1999. The combined firm is the single largest bank in Europe. And, as we shall see, Deutsche Bank played several key roles in events connected to the September 11 attacks. The Scope of Known Insider Trading Before looking further into these relationships it is necessary to look at the insider trading information that is being ignored by Reuters, The New York Times and other mass media. It is well documented that the CIA has long monitored such trades — in real time — as potential warnings of terrorist attacks and other economic moves contrary to U.S. interests. Previous stories in FTW have specifically highlighted the use of Promis software to monitor such trades. It is necessary to understand only two key financial terms to understand the significance of these trades, “selling short” and “put options”. “Selling Short” is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months. “Put Options” are contracts giving the buyer the option to sell stocks at a later date. Purchased at nominal prices of, for example, $1.00 per share, they are sold in blocks of 100 shares. If exercised, they give the holder the option of selling selected stocks at a future date at a price set when the contract is issued. Thus, for an investment of ,000 it might be possible to tie up 10,000 shares of United or American Airlines at per share, and the seller of the option is then obligated to buy them if the option is executed. If the stock has fallen to when the contract matures, the holder of the option can purchase the shares for and immediately sell them for — regardless of where the market then stands. A call option is the reverse of a put option, which is, in effect, a derivatives bet that the stock price will go up. A September 21 story by the Israeli Herzliyya International Policy Institute for Counterterrorism, entitled “Black Tuesday: The World’s Largest Insider Trading Scam?” documented the following trades connected to the September 11 attacks: Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options. Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these “insiders” would have profited by almost million. On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;... Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent “insiders,” they would represent a gain of about million. [The levels of put options purchased above were more than six times higher than normal.] No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 2,157 of its October put options bought in the three trading days before Black Tuesday; this compares to an average of 27 contracts per day before September 6. Morgan Stanley’s share price fell from .90 to .50 in the aftermath of the attacks. Assuming that 2,000 of these options contracts were bought based upon knowledge of the approaching attacks, their purchasers could have profited by at least $1.2 million. Merrill Lynch & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 12,215 October put options bought in the four trading days before the attacks; the previous average volume in those shares had been 252 contracts per day [a 1200% increase!]. When trading resumed, Merrill’s shares fell from .88 to .50; assuming that 11,000 option contracts were bought by “insiders,” their profit would have been about .5 million. European regulators are examining trades in Germany’s Munich Re, Switzerland’s Swiss Re, and AXA of France, all major reinsurers with exposure to the Black Tuesday disaster. [FTW Note: AXA also owns more than 25% of American Airlines stock making the attacks a “double whammy” for them.] On September 29, 2001 — in a vital story that has gone unnoticed by the major media — the San Francisco Chronicle reported, “Investors have yet to collect more than .5 million in profits they made trading options in the stock of United Airlines before the Sept. 11, terrorist attacks, according to a source familiar with the trades and market data. “The uncollected money raises suspicions that the investors — whose identities and nationalities have not been made public — had advance knowledge of the strikes.” They don’t dare show up now. The suspension of trading for four days after the attacks made it impossible to cash-out quickly and claim the prize before investigators started looking. “... October series options for UAL Corp. were purchased in highly unusual volumes three trading days before the terrorist attacks for a total outlay of ,070; investors bought the option contracts, each representing 100 shares, for 90 cents each. [This represents 230,000 shares]. Those options are now selling at more than each. There are still 2,313 so-called “put” options outstanding [valued at .77 million and representing 231,300 shares] according to the Options Clearinghouse Corp.” “... The source familiar with the United trades identified Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the American investment banking arm of German giant Deutsche Bank, as the investment bank used to purchase at least some of these options...” This was the operation managed by Krongard until as recently as 1998. As reported in other news stories, Deutsche Bank was also the hub of insider trading activity connected to Munich Re. just before the attacks. CIA, the Banks and the Brokers Understanding the interrelationships between CIA and the banking and brokerage world is critical to grasping the already frightening implications of the above revelations. Let’s look at the history of CIA, Wall Street and the big banks by looking at some of the key players in CIA’s history. Clark Clifford — The National Security Act of 1947 was written by Clark Clifford, a Democratic Party powerhouse, former Secretary of Defense, and one-time advisor to President Harry Truman. In the 1980s, as Chairman of First American Bancshares, Clifford was instrumental in getting the corrupt CIA drug bank BCCI a license to operate on American shores. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and banker. John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles — These two brothers “designed” the CIA for Clifford. Both were active in intelligence operations during WW II. Allen Dulles was the U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland where he met frequently with Nazi leaders and looked after U.S. investments in Germany. John Foster went on to become Secretary of State under Dwight Eisenhower and Allen went on to serve as CIA Director under Eisenhower and was later fired by JFK. Their professions: partners in the most powerful - to this day - Wall Street law firm of Sullivan, Cromwell. Bill Casey — Ronald Reagan’s CIA Director and OSS veteran who served as chief wrangler during the Iran-Contra years was, under President Richard Nixon, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and stockbroker. David Doherty — The current Vice President of the New York Stock Exchange for enforcement is the retired General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency. George Herbert Walker Bush — President from 1989 to January 1993, also ser